RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 5.695.Findings and orders of the court—disposition

Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 12. Cases Petitioned Under Section 300 · Article 3. Disposition · Last amended 2024 · Last verified September 10, 2026

In one sentenceRule 5.695 lists the orders a court may make at disposition and the findings that must accompany removal, reunification services, and the setting of a permanency hearing.

Full Text of Rule 5.695

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) Orders of the court (§§ 245.5, 358, 360, 361, 361.2, 390)
At the disposition hearing, the court may:
(1) Dismiss the petition with specific reasons stated in the minutes;
(2) Place the child under a program of supervision for a time period consistent with section 301 and order that services be provided;
(3) If the requirements of section 360(a) are met, appoint a legal guardian for the child without declaring dependency and order the clerk, as soon as the guardian has signed the required affirmation, to issue letters of guardianship, which are not subject to the confidential protections of juvenile court documents in section 827;
(4) If the requirements of section 360(a) are met, declare dependency, appoint a legal guardian for the child, and order the clerk, as soon as the guardian has signed the required affirmation, to issue letters of guardianship, which are not subject to the confidential protections of juvenile court documents in section 827;
(5) Declare dependency, permit the child to remain at home, and order that services be provided;
(6) Declare dependency, permit the child to remain at home, limit the control to be exercised by the parent or guardian, and order that services be provided; or
(7) Declare dependency, remove physical custody from the parent or guardian, and:
(A) After stating on the record or in writing the factual basis for the order, order custody to a noncustodial parent, terminate jurisdiction, and direct that Custody Order—Juvenile—Final Judgment (form JV-200) be prepared and filed under rule 5.700;
(B) After stating on the record or in writing the factual basis for the order, order custody to a noncustodial parent with services to one or both parents; or
(C) Make a placement order and consider granting specific visitation rights to the child’s grandparents.
(b) Limitations on parental control (§§ 245.5, 361, 362; Gov. Code, § 7579.5)
(1) If a child is declared a dependent, the court may clearly and specifically limit the control over the child by a parent or guardian.
(2) If the court orders that a parent or guardian retain physical custody of the child subject to court-ordered supervision, the parent or guardian must be ordered to participate in child welfare services or services provided by an appropriate agency designated by the court.
(3) The court must consider whether it is necessary to limit the rights of the parent or guardian to make educational or developmental-services decisions for the child or youth. If the court limits those rights, it must follow the procedures in rules 5.649–5.651.
(c) Removal of custody—required findings (§ 361)
(1) The court may not order a dependent removed from the physical custody of a parent or guardian with whom the child resided at the time the petition was filed, unless the court makes one or more of the findings in section 361(c) by clear and convincing evidence.
(2) The court may not order a dependent removed from the physical custody of a parent with whom the child did not reside at the time the petition was initiated unless the juvenile court makes both of the findings in section 361(d) by clear and convincing evidence.
(d) Reasonable efforts finding
The court must consider whether reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate the need for removal have been made and make one of the following findings:
(1) Reasonable efforts have been made to prevent removal; or
(2) Reasonable efforts have not been made to prevent removal.
(e) Family-finding determination (§ 309)
(1) If the child is removed, the court must consider and determine whether the social worker has exercised due diligence in conducting the required investigation to identify, locate, and notify the child’s kin. The court must consider the mandatory activities listed in rule 5.637(d)(2) and may consider the additional activities listed in rule 5.637(d)(3) in determining whether the agency has exercised due diligence in family finding. The court must document its determination by making a finding on the record. If the dispositional hearing is continued, the court may set a hearing to be held 30 days from the date of removal or as soon as possible thereafter to consider and determine whether the social worker has exercised due diligence in conducting the required investigation to identify, locate, and notify the child’s kin.
(2) If the court finds that the social worker has not exercised due diligence, the court may order the social worker to exercise due diligence in conducting an investigation to identify, locate, and notify the child’s kin—except for any individual the social worker identifies as inappropriate to notify under rule 5.637(e)—and may require a written or oral report to the court.
(f) Provision of reunification services (§ 361.5)
(1) Unless the court makes a finding that reunification services need not be provided under subdivision (b) of section 361.5 if a child is removed from the custody of a parent or legal guardian, the court must order the county welfare department to provide reunification services to the child and the child’s mother and statutorily presumed parent, or the child’s legal guardian, to facilitate reunification of the family as required in section 361.5.
(2) On a finding and declaration of paternity by the juvenile court or proof of a prior declaration of paternity by any court of competent jurisdiction, the juvenile court may order services for the child and the biological father, if the court determines that such services will benefit the child.
(3) If a child is removed from the custody of a parent or guardian, and reunification services are ordered, the court must order visitation between the child and the parent or guardian for whom services are ordered. Visits are to be as frequent as possible, consistent with the well-being of the child.
(4) Reunification services must not be provided when the parent has voluntarily relinquished the child and the relinquishment has been filed with the State Department of Social Services, or if the court has appointed a guardian under section 360.
(5) Except when the order is made under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of section 361.5, if the court orders no reunification services for every parent otherwise eligible for such services, the court must conduct a hearing under section 366.26 within 120 days and:
(A) Order that the social worker provide a copy of the child’s birth certificate to the caregiver consistent with sections 16010.4(e)(5) and 16010.5(b)–(c); and
(B) Order that the social worker provide a child or youth 16 years of age or older with a certified copy of his or her birth certificate unless the court finds that provision of the birth certificate would be inappropriate.
(6) A judgment, order, or decree setting a hearing under section 366.26 is not an immediately appealable order. Review may be sought only by filing a Notice of Intent to File Writ Petition and Request for Record (California Rules of Court, Rule 8.450) (form JV-820) or other notice of intent to file a writ petition and request for record, and a Petition for Extraordinary Writ (California Rules of Court, Rules 8.452, 8.456) (form JV-825) or other petition for extraordinary writ. If a party wishes to preserve any right to review on appeal of the findings and orders made under this rule, the party must seek an extraordinary writ under rules 8.450 and 8.452.
(7) A judgment, order, or decree setting a hearing under section 366.26 may be reviewed on appeal following the order of the 366.26 hearing only if the following have occurred:
(A) An extraordinary writ was sought by the timely filing of a Notice of Intent to File Writ Petition and Request for Record (California Rules of Court, Rule 8.450) (form JV-820) or other notice of intent to file a writ petition and request for record, and a Petition for Extraordinary Writ (California Rules of Court, Rules 8.452, 8.456) (form JV-825) or other petition for extraordinary writ; and
(B) The petition for extraordinary writ was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits.
(8) Review on appeal of the order setting a hearing under section 366.26 is limited to issues raised in a previous petition for extraordinary writ that were supported by an adequate record.
(9) Failure to file a notice of intent to file a writ petition and request for record and a petition for extraordinary writ review within the period specified by rules 8.450 and 8.452 to substantively address the issues challenged, or to support the challenge by an adequate record, precludes subsequent review on appeal of the findings and orders made under this rule.
(10) When the court orders a hearing under section 366.26, the court must advise orally all parties present, and by first-class mail or by electronic service in accordance with section 212.5 for parties not present, that if the party wishes to preserve any right to review on appeal of the order setting the hearing under section 366.26, the party must seek an extraordinary writ by filing a Notice of Intent to File Writ Petition and Request for Record (California Rules of Court, Rule 8.450) (form JV-820) or other notice of intent to file a writ petition and request for record and a Petition for Extraordinary Writ (California Rules of Court, Rules 8.452, 8.456) (form JV-825) or other petition for extraordinary writ.
(A) Within 24 hours of the hearing, notice by first-class mail or by electronic service in accordance with section 212.5 must be provided by the clerk of the court to the last known address of any party who is not present when the court orders the hearing under section 366.26.
(B) Copies of Petition for Extraordinary Writ (California Rules of Court, Rules 8.452, 8.456) (form JV-825) and Notice of Intent to File Writ Petition and Request for Record (California Rules of Court, Rule 8.450) (form JV-820) must be available in the courtroom and must accompany all mailed notices informing the parties of their rights.
(C) If the notice is for a hearing at which the social worker will recommend the termination of parental rights, the notice may be electronically served in accordance with section 212.5, but only in addition to service of the notice by first-class mail.
(g) Information regarding termination of parent-child relationship (§§ 361, 361.5)
If a child is removed from the physical custody of the parent or guardian under either section 361 or 361.5, the court must:
(1) State the facts on which the decision is based; and
(2) Notify the parents that their parental rights may be terminated if custody is not returned within 6 months of the dispositional hearing or within 12 months of the date the child entered foster care, whichever time limit is applicable.
(h) Setting a hearing under section 366.26
At the disposition hearing, the court may not set a hearing under section 366.26 to consider termination of the rights of only one parent unless that parent is the only surviving parent, or the rights of the other parent have been terminated by a California court of competent jurisdiction or by a court of competent jurisdiction of another state under the statutes of that state, or the other parent has relinquished custody of the child to the county welfare department.
End

Plain-English Summary

Seven outcomes are available at disposition. The court may dismiss the petition with reasons in the minutes; place the child under a program of supervision with services; appoint a legal guardian without declaring dependency, or declare dependency and appoint one, ordering letters of guardianship to issue once the guardian signs the affirmation — letters that are not confidential juvenile documents; declare dependency and leave the child at home with services; do the same while limiting the parent’s control; or declare dependency and remove physical custody. On removal it may, after stating the factual basis on the record or in writing, place the child with a noncustodial parent and end jurisdiction with a final custody order, place with a noncustodial parent while providing services, or make a placement order and consider visitation rights for the grandparents.

Any limitation on parental control must be clear and specific. Where a parent keeps physical custody under court supervision, they must be ordered to take part in child welfare or other designated services. And the court must consider whether to limit the right to make educational or developmental-services decisions, following the educational-rights rules if it does.

Removal carries a heightened standard. A child cannot be removed from a parent or guardian they lived with when the petition was filed unless the court makes one or more of the statutory findings by clear and convincing evidence, and cannot be removed from a parent they did not live with unless the court makes both of the applicable findings by that same standard. Either way the court must consider and expressly find whether reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate the need for removal were made.

Family finding is checked again here. If the child is removed, the court must consider and determine whether the social worker exercised due diligence in identifying, locating and notifying kin — weighing the mandatory activities and, if it chooses, the additional ones — and must document its determination on the record. Where disposition is continued the court may set a hearing 30 days from removal for this purpose. Where diligence is lacking, it may order the work done, excluding anyone the social worker has identified as inappropriate to notify, and require a report.

Reunification services are the default. Unless the court finds they need not be provided, it must order the county to provide services to the child and the mother and statutorily presumed parent, or the legal guardian. Services for a biological father may be ordered where the court determines the child will benefit. Where services are ordered after removal, the court must order visitation — as frequent as possible, consistent with the child’s well-being. Services are not provided where the parent has relinquished the child and the relinquishment is filed with the state, or where a guardian has been appointed.

Where the court denies services to every otherwise-eligible parent, it must set a permanency hearing within 120 days, order the social worker to give the caregiver a copy of the child’s birth certificate, and order a certified copy given to a child of 16 or older unless that would be inappropriate.

Setting that hearing is not appealable. Review comes only through an extraordinary writ — a notice of intent on form JV-820 and a petition on form JV-825, or their equivalents. The setting order can be reviewed on appeal after the permanency hearing only if a writ was timely sought and was summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits, and review is then limited to issues raised in that writ petition on an adequate record. Missing the deadline, failing to address the issues substantively, or failing to support them with an adequate record forecloses appeal.

So the court must say so out loud. When it sets a permanency hearing it advises everyone present orally, and everyone absent by first-class mail or electronic service, that a writ must be sought to preserve any right of review. Notice to an absent party goes out within 24 hours. Copies of both forms must be available in the courtroom and must accompany every mailed notice. And where the hearing is one at which termination of parental rights will be recommended, electronic service may only supplement first-class mail, never replace it.

Two more things. On removal under either statute the court must state the facts behind its decision and warn the parents that their rights may be terminated if custody is not returned within 6 months of disposition or 12 months of the child’s entry into foster care, whichever applies. And it may not set a permanency hearing directed at one parent alone unless that parent is the only surviving parent, the other parent’s rights have been terminated by a court of competent jurisdiction, or the other parent has relinquished custody to the county.

Frequently Asked Questions

What can the court order at disposition?

Dismiss the petition; order a program of supervision with services; appoint a legal guardian with or without declaring dependency; declare dependency and leave the child at home, with or without limits on parental control; or declare dependency and remove physical custody, with placement, a noncustodial parent order, or a final custody order ending jurisdiction.

What standard applies to removing a child at disposition?

Clear and convincing evidence. One or more of the section 361(c) findings is required for a parent the child lived with when the petition was filed; both of the section 361(d) findings are required for a parent they did not live with.

When must reunification services be ordered?

Whenever a child is removed, unless the court finds services need not be provided under section 361.5(b). Where services are ordered, the court must also order visitation, as frequent as possible consistent with the child’s well-being.

Can the order setting a section 366.26 hearing be appealed?

No. It is not an immediately appealable order. Review may be sought only by an extraordinary writ — a notice of intent on form JV-820 and a petition on form JV-825, or their equivalents — and appeal after the hearing is possible only where that writ was timely sought and summarily denied or otherwise not decided on the merits.

What warning must parents be given on removal?

That their parental rights may be terminated if custody is not returned within 6 months of the dispositional hearing or within 12 months of the date the child entered foster care, whichever limit applies. The court must also state the facts on which its decision is based.

Can the court set a hearing to terminate only one parent’s rights?

Only where that parent is the only surviving parent, the other parent’s rights have been terminated by a California court or a court of another state under that state’s law, or the other parent has relinquished custody of the child to the county welfare department.

Amendment History

Rule 5.695 amended effective January 1, 2024; adopted as rule 1456 effective January 1, 1991; previously amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 1993, July 1, 1993, January 1, 1994, January 1, 1995, July 1, 1995, January 1, 1996, January 1, 1997, July 1, 1997, January 1, 1999, July 1, 1999, January 1, 2001, July 1, 2001, July 1, 2002, January 1, 2004, January 1, 2006, January 1, 2008, January 1, 2010, January 1, 2011, January 1, 2014, January 1, 2015, January 1, 2017, January 1, 2019 and January 1, 2021.

(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2021; previously amended effective July 1, 1995, January 1, 2007, January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2017.) (Subd (b) relettered effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (b); previously relettered as subd (c) effective July 1, 1995; previously amended effective July 1, 2002, January 1, 2004, January 1, 2007, January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2014.) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2019; adopted as subd (c); previously relettered as subd (d) effective July 1, 1995; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 1999, July 1, 2002, and January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered effective January 1, 2017.) (Subd (d) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (d); previously relettered as subd (e) effective July 1, 1995; amended effective July 1, 2002, and January 1, 2006.) (Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2024; adopted as subd (f) effective January 1, 2011; previously amended effective January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2015; previously amended and relettered effective January 1, 2017) (Subd (f) relettered and amended effective January 1, 2024; adopted as subd (e); previously relettered as subd (f) effective July 1, 1995, and as subd (h) January 1, 2011; previously relettered and amended as subd (g) effective January 1, 2017; previously amended effective January 1, 1993, July 1, 1993, January 1, 1994, January 1, 1995, January 1, 1996, July 1, 1997, January 1, 1999, July 1, 1999, January 1, 2001, July 1, 2001, July 1, 2002, January 1, 2007, January 1, 2010, January 1, 2014, January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2019.) (Subd (g) relettered effective January 1, 2024; adopted as subd (f); previously relettered as subd (g) effective July 1, 1995,as subd (i) effective January 1, 2011, and as subd (h) effective January 1, 2017; previously amended effective January 1, 2001, July 1, 2002, January 1, 2015.) (Subd (h) relettered effective January 1, 2024; adopted as subd (j) effective July 1, 1997; previously amended effective July 1, 2002; previously relettered as subd (l) effective January 1, 2011, and as subd (i) effective January 1, 2017.)

Source & verification. Rule text is reproduced verbatim from the Judicial Council of California. Adopted by the Judicial Council of California. Last verified September 10, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: disposition orders juvenile dependency Californiaclear and convincing removal section 361form JV-820 notice of intent writ petitionreunification services order disposition