RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 5.684.Contested hearing on petition

Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 12. Cases Petitioned Under Section 300 · Article 2. Jurisdiction · Last amended 2021 · Last verified September 10, 2026

In one sentenceRule 5.684 governs the contested jurisdiction hearing — what evidence comes in, which privileges do not apply, and the findings the court makes whether or not the allegations are proved.

Full Text of Rule 5.684

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

(a) Contested jurisdiction hearing (§ 355)
If the parent or guardian denies the allegations of the petition, the court must hold a contested hearing and determine whether the allegations in the petition are true.
(b) Admissibility of evidence—general (§§ 355, 355.1)
Except as provided in sections 355(c) and 355.1 and (c) and (d) of this rule, the admission and exclusion of evidence must be in accordance with the Evidence Code as it applies to civil cases.
(c) Reports
(1) A social study, with hearsay evidence contained in it, is admissible as provided in section 355.
(2) The social study must be provided to all parties and their counsel by the county welfare department within a reasonable time before the hearing.
(d) Inapplicable privileges (Evid. Code, §§ 972, 986)
The privilege not to testify or to be called as a witness against a spouse or domestic partner, and the confidential marital communication privilege, does not apply to dependency proceedings.
(e) Findings of court—allegations true (§ 356)
If the court determines by a preponderance of the evidence that the allegations of the petition are true, the court must make findings on each of the following, noted in the minutes:
(1) Notice has been given as required by law;
(2) The birthdate and county of residence of the child;
(3) The allegations of the petition are true; and
(4) The child is described by one or more subdivisions of section 300.
(f) Disposition and continuance pending disposition hearing (§§ 356, 358)
After making the findings in (e), the court must proceed to a disposition hearing under rule 5.690 or rule 5.697, if the youth will attain 18 years of age before the holding of the disposition hearing. The court may continue the disposition hearing as provided in section 358.
(g) Findings of court—allegations not proved (§§ 356, 361.1)
If the court determines that the allegations of the petition have not been proved by a preponderance of the evidence, the court must dismiss the petition and terminate any detention orders relating to the petition. The court must order that the child be returned to the physical custody of the parent or guardian immediately but, in any event, not more than two working days following the date of that finding, unless the parent or guardian and the agency with custody of the child agree to a later date for the child’s release. The court must make the following findings, noted in the order of the court:
(1) Notice has been given as required by law;
(2) The birthdate and county of residence of the child; and
(3) The allegations of the petition are not proved.
End

Plain-English Summary

If the parent or guardian denies the allegations, the court holds a contested hearing and decides whether they are true. Evidence comes in and stays out according to the Evidence Code as it applies to civil cases, subject to the statutory exceptions and this rule.

The social study is admissible with the hearsay it contains, as the statute allows, and the county welfare department must give it to every party and their counsel a reasonable time before the hearing.

Two privileges do not survive in dependency court: the privilege not to testify or be called as a witness against a spouse or domestic partner, and the confidential marital communication privilege.

If the court finds the allegations true by a preponderance of the evidence, four findings go in the minutes: notice was given as required by law; the child’s birthdate and county of residence; the allegations are true; and the child is described by one or more subdivisions of section 300. The court then proceeds to disposition — or the rule for a youth turning 18 first — and may continue disposition as the statute allows.

If the allegations are not proved, the petition is dismissed and any detention orders are terminated. The child must be returned to the parent’s or guardian’s physical custody immediately and in any event within two working days of the finding, unless the parent and the agency with custody agree on a later date. The court records three findings: notice as required by law, the child’s birthdate and county of residence, and that the allegations are not proved.

Frequently Asked Questions

What standard of proof applies at the jurisdiction hearing?

A preponderance of the evidence. If the court so finds the allegations true, it makes the required findings and proceeds to disposition.

Which rules of evidence apply?

The Evidence Code as it applies to civil cases, except as provided by sections 355(c) and 355.1 and by this rule — which makes the social study admissible with its hearsay and removes the spousal privileges.

Can a spouse refuse to testify in a dependency case?

No. Neither the privilege not to testify or be called as a witness against a spouse or domestic partner, nor the confidential marital communication privilege, applies to dependency proceedings.

What happens if the petition is not proved?

The court dismisses the petition, terminates any detention orders, and orders the child returned to the parent’s or guardian’s physical custody immediately — in any event no more than two working days after the finding, unless the parent and the custodial agency agree on a later date.

Amendment History

Rule 5.684 amended effective January 1, 2021; adopted as rule 1450 effective January 1, 1991; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, January 1, 2005, and January 1, 2017; previously amended and renumbered as rule 5.684 effective January 1, 2007.

(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2017; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2017; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (d) relettered effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (e); previously amended effective July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (e) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (f); previously amended effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (f) amended effective January 1, 2021; adopted as subd (g); previously amended effective July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2017.) (Subd (g) relettered effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (h); previously amended effective July 1, 1997, January 1, 2005, and January 1, 2007.)

Source & verification. Rule text is reproduced verbatim from the Judicial Council of California. Adopted by the Judicial Council of California. Last verified September 10, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: contested jurisdiction hearing dependency Californiasocial study admissibility section 355marital privilege dependency proceedingspetition not proved dismissal juvenile