Rule 5.650.Appointed educational rights holder
Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 10. Medication, Mental Health, and Education · Last amended 2015 · Last verified September 10, 2026
Full Text of Rule 5.650
Plain-English Summary
Whenever the court limits a parent’s or guardian’s educational or developmental-services rights, even temporarily, it must use form JV-535 either to appoint a responsible adult or to record why it cannot. Two situations excuse an appointment. The first is a child in a planned permanent living arrangement whose caregiver may already exercise those rights without a court order. The second is where no responsible adult can be identified — in which case the court either refers the child to the local educational agency for a surrogate parent and makes developmental-services decisions itself, or, where a surrogate is not warranted, makes both kinds of decision itself with the input of any interested person. If the court has to decide for a child before disposition, it must order that every effort be made to find a responsible adult for the future.
For a nonminor or nonminor dependent, the court may appoint or continue a rights holder only where the youth has chosen not to decide for themselves or is deemed incompetent — and, for developmental-services decisions, only where that is in the youth’s best interests.
Who gets appointed matters. The court must find out whether a relative, nonrelative extended family member or other adult known to the child is available and willing, and should consider that person before an adult the child does not know. Anyone excluded or conflicted under the governing statutes and regulations cannot be appointed.
The surrogate-parent route runs on a schedule. The referral goes out by first-class mail within five court days of the order, with form JV-536 attached. The agency then has 30 calendar days of reasonable effort to identify and appoint a surrogate, and must report back on form JV-536 within five court days — whether it succeeded or not, and in the latter case what efforts continue. Any resignation, termination, replacement or new appointment is reported the same way, and the child’s attorney, social worker or probation officer may then ask for a hearing on form JV-539.
Appointment transfers the parent’s rights: notice of educational and developmental-services meetings, participation in them, and decisionmaking authority all move to the rights holder unless the court says otherwise. Returning custody to a parent reinstates their rights unless the court specifically finds continued limitation necessary. Appointing a guardian moves the rights to the guardian on the same terms.
The rights holder stands in the parent’s shoes. They may access records and authorize disclosure under FERPA, receive notice of and take part in school discipline proceedings, advocate on identification and assessment, service planning, least restrictive placement, plan review, and the provision of a free appropriate public education, attend and sign for education and service plans, and consent to those plans including related nonemergency medical, mental health, and therapy services.
The duties are just as concrete: investigate what the child needs and whether those needs are met; work to keep the school placement stable and file a statement to the court after any change of educational placement saying whether it serves the child and what was done to keep them in the school of origin; secure the least restrictive appropriate program, access to resources and activities, prompt resolution of discipline, and any early intervention or developmental services required by law. The rights holder must also meet the child at least once and as often as needed, be culturally sensitive, keep confidentiality, take part in every planning and dispute process, and maintain the knowledge to do the job. Before each statutory review they must give information or written recommendations, or attend the hearing.
Service ends on defined events: dismissal or the end of the dispositional hearing for a pre-disposition appointment; full restoration of the parent’s rights; the child turning 18, unless the youth chooses not to decide or is deemed incompetent and continuation is in their best interests, in which case it may run to 21 or the end of jurisdiction; the appointment of another rights holder, guardian or conservator; or the designation of an identified caregiver in a planned permanent living arrangement. A rights holder who resigns must notify the court and the child’s attorney, and a replacement hearing must be set within 14 days of a request.
Orders get distributed widely — to the child if 10 or older, their attorney, the social worker or probation officer, an Indian child’s tribe, the local foster youth educational liaison, the county foster youth services coordinator, any regional centre coordinator, and the rights holder — within five court days. Any previous rights holder or surrogate must be told their appointment has ended. And where a rights holder, parent included, asks for help learning the law, the court must have them pointed to the available resources.
Advisory Committee Comment
The following comment is published by the Judicial Council of California alongside the rule itself — not commentary from this site.
Under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the court may appoint a surrogate parent to speak and act on behalf of a pupil in all matters relating to the identification, evaluation, and educational placement of the child and to the provision of the child’s free, appropriate public education. (20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)(2); 34 C.F.R. § 300.519.) Under Welfare and Institutions Code sections 361 and 726, the court must appoint a responsible adult as an educational representative or rights holder to make decisions regarding the child’s educational or developmental-services needs when the parent’s rights to make those decisions have been limited. A court-appointed educational rights holder is responsible for protecting the child’s rights and interests with respect to educational or developmental services, including any special education and related services. If the court limits the parent’s decisionmaking rights and cannot identify a responsible adult to appoint as educational rights holder, and the appointment of a surrogate parent is not warranted, sections 361 and 726 authorize the court to make educational or developmental-services decisions for the child with the input of interested persons. If, however, the court cannot identify a responsible adult to appoint as educational rights holder and there is reason to believe that the child needs special education and related services, the court must refer the child to the local educational agency (LEA) for the appointment of a surrogate parent. Sections 361 and 726 do not authorize the court to make educational decisions for a child in these circumstances. The surrogate parent appointed by the LEA acts as a parent for the purpose of making decisions with respect to special education and related services and the provision of a free, appropriate public education on behalf of the child. (Gov. Code, § 7579.5(c); Ed. Code, § 56028; 34 C.F.R. § 300.30(b)(2); see 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401(9), 1414(d).) If, however, the LEA does not appoint a surrogate parent in a timely manner, the court has the authority to join the LEA in the dependency proceedings under section 362 and rule 5.575. In the period between the setting of the joinder hearing and the appointment of a surrogate parent by the LEA, the court may make educational decisions for the child under the general authority granted by section 362(a). The appointment of a surrogate parent notwithstanding, the court holds the authority under sections 361 and 726 to make developmental-services decisions if it cannot identify a responsible adult to do so.
Frequently Asked Questions
Must the court always appoint an educational rights holder?
Whenever it limits a parent’s or guardian’s rights, it must use form JV-535 either to appoint a responsible adult or to document one of the situations where it cannot — a caregiver in a planned permanent living arrangement who already holds those rights, or the absence of any identifiable responsible adult.
Should the court prefer someone the child knows?
Yes. The court must determine whether a relative, nonrelative extended family member or other adult known to the child is available and willing, and should consider appointing that person before an adult not known to the child.
How fast must a surrogate parent be appointed?
The referral is served within five court days of the order; the local educational agency must make reasonable efforts to identify and appoint a surrogate within 30 calendar days, reporting back on form JV-536 within five court days either way.
What can an educational rights holder actually do?
They hold the parent’s rights for education and developmental services — access to records, FERPA disclosures, notice of and participation in discipline proceedings and planning meetings, advocacy on assessment, placement and plan review, and consent to the child’s education and service plans including related nonemergency medical, mental health and therapy services.
When does the appointment end?
On dismissal or the end of disposition for a temporary appointment, on full restoration of the parent’s rights, when the child turns 18 (extendable to 21 where the youth chooses not to decide or is deemed incompetent and continuation serves their best interests), on appointment of another rights holder, guardian or conservator, or on designation of an identified caregiver in a planned permanent living arrangement.
What happens if the rights holder resigns?
They notify the court and the child’s attorney, using form JV-537 if they wish. The child’s attorney, social worker or probation officer may then file form JV-539, and the hearing must be set within 14 days of the request.
Amendment History
Rule 5.650 amended effective January 1, 2015; adopted as rule 1499 effective July 1, 2002; previously amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2004, January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2014.
(Subd (a) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2014; adopted as subd (b) effective January 1, 2004; previously amended effective January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2008.) (Subd (b) adopted effective January 1, 2014.) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2014; adopted effective January 1, 2004; previously amended effective January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2008.) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2014; adopted as subd (b); previously amended and relettered effective January 1, 2004; previously amended effective January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2008.) (Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2014; adopted effective January 1, 2004; previously amended effective January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2008.) (Subd (f) amended effective January 1, 2014; adopted effective January 1, 2008.) (Subd (g) amended effective January 1, 2014; adopted effective January 1, 2008.) (Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2014; adopted effective January 1, 2008.) (Subd (i) amended effective January 1, 2015; adopted effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective January 1, 2014.) (Subd (j) amended effective January 1, 2014; adopted effective January 1, 2008.)