Rule 5.610.Transfer-out hearing
Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 7. Intercounty Transfers; Out-of-County Placements; Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children · Last amended 2019 · Last verified September 10, 2026
Full Text of Rule 5.610
Plain-English Summary
Residence, for transfer purposes, is the residence of the person with the legal right to physical custody under a prior court order. Where no order determines custody, both parents are deemed to have physical custody; where there is no paternity finding, the mother is. For a ward, residence may be with the person the child lives with by the court’s approval. It may be verified by a declaration from a social worker or probation officer in either county.
Timing differs by case type. A delinquency transfer must be ordered before the disposition hearing begins, without adjudging the child a ward. A dependency case may transfer before or after disposition.
The test is not merely where the child lives. After determining the custodian’s identity and residence, the court must consider whether transfer would be in the child’s best interest — and may not transfer unless it determines the transfer will protect or further that interest.
The date-certain requirement is what keeps a transferred child from falling between two courts. The sending court must set the transfer-in hearing in the receiving court — within 5 court days if the child is in custody, 10 if not — and state the date, time and location on the record. Every court’s website must carry up-to-date contact information for its dependency and delinquency clerks and when and where transfer-in hearings are held.
A child transported in custody must be delivered at least two business days before the hearing, with a certified copy of the complete file travelling with them; otherwise the clerk transmits the file within five court days. The order may be appealed by either county — but the receiving county must assume jurisdiction on receipt and filing regardless.
Advisory Committee Comment
The following comment is published by the Judicial Council of California alongside the rule itself — not commentary from this site.
Juvenile court judicial officers throughout the state have expressed concern that in determining whether or not to transfer a juvenile court case, the best interest of the subject child is being overlooked or at least outweighed by a desire to shift the financial burdens of case management and foster care. The advisory committee has clarified rule 5.610 in order to stress that in considering an intercounty transfer, as in all matters relating to children within its jurisdiction, the court has a mandate to act in the best interest of the subject children. Juvenile Court Transfer-Out Orders (form JV-550) was adopted for mandatory use commencing January 1, 1992. Although the finding regarding the best interest of the child was noted on the original form, the language has been emphasized on the amended form.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is a child’s residence determined for transfer?
By the residence of the person with the legal right to physical custody under a prior court order. Absent such an order, both parents are deemed to have physical custody; absent a paternity finding, the mother is.
Can a case be transferred just because the family moved?
Not automatically. The court may not transfer unless it determines that the transfer will protect or further the child’s best interest.
When is the hearing in the new county?
The sending court must set a date certain — within 5 court days of the transfer-out order if the child is in custody, within 10 court days if not — and state the date, time and location on the record.
Does an appeal stop the transfer?
No. Notwithstanding the filing of a notice of appeal, the receiving county must assume jurisdiction of the case on receipt and filing of the order of transfer.
Amendment History
Rule 5.610 amended effective January 1, 2019; adopted as rule 1425 effective January 1, 1990; previously amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 1992, January 1, 1993, July 1, 1999, January 1, 2004, January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2017.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2019; previously amended effective January 1, 2004, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2017; previously amended effective January 1, 2004, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2019; previously amended effective January 1, 2004, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2004.) (Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2017; repealed and adopted effective January 1, 1990; previously amended effective January 1, 1993, January 1, 2004, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (f) adopted effective January 1, 2017.) (Subd (g) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2017; repealed and adopted as subd (f) effective January 1, 1990; previously amended effective January 1, 1993, January 1, 2004, and January 1, 2007.) (Subd (h) relettered January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (g) effective January 1, 2007; previously amended January 1, 2015.) (Subd (i) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2017; repealed and adopted as subd (g); previously amended effective January 1, 1992, January 1, 1993, July 1, 1999, and January 1, 2004; previously amended and relettered as subd (h) effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (j) relettered effective January 1, 2017; repealed and adopted as subd (h); previously amended effective January 1, 1992, and January 1, 2004; previously amended and relettered as subd (i) effective January 1, 2007.)