Rule 5.548.Granting immunity to witnesses
Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 3. General Conduct of Juvenile Court Proceedings · Last amended 2007 · Last verified September 10, 2026
Full Text of Rule 5.548
Plain-English Summary
Where it appears that testimony being sought may tend to incriminate a witness, the court must advise them of the privilege against self-incrimination and the possible consequences of testifying — and of the right to counsel, appointed if they are indigent.
Where the witness then refuses to answer or produce evidence on that ground, a judge may grant immunity and order the question answered. In delinquency proceedings the prosecuting attorney requests it and the court proceeds under the Penal Code; the witness may be granted use or transactional immunity, and compelled testimony — or information derived from it — may not be used against them in any criminal case, including a juvenile delinquency proceeding.
In dependency and status-offence proceedings the prosecutor or petitioner may request, jointly or alone. If not joint, the other party gets an opportunity to show why immunity should not be granted, and the judge decides. If joint, the judge must grant it unless doing so would be clearly contrary to the public interest — with the terms stated in the record.
Immunity has a limit: it does not protect against proceedings or prosecution for perjury, false swearing, or contempt committed in answering or failing to answer, or in producing or failing to produce evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if a witness might incriminate themselves?
The court must advise them of the privilege against self-incrimination and the possible consequences of testifying, and inform them of the right to counsel — appointed if they are indigent.
Who can ask for a witness to be given immunity?
In delinquency, the prosecuting attorney. In dependency or status-offence proceedings, the prosecuting attorney or the petitioner, separately or jointly.
Does immunity cover lying under oath?
No. A witness may still face juvenile proceedings or criminal prosecution for perjury, false swearing, or contempt committed in answering or failing to answer, or in producing or failing to produce evidence.
Amendment History
Rule 5.548 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as rule 1421 effective January 1, 1990; previously amended effective January 1, 1998.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 1998.) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2007.)