RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 5.548.Granting immunity to witnesses

Division 3. Juvenile Rules · Chapter 3. General Conduct of Juvenile Court Proceedings · Last amended 2007 · Last verified September 10, 2026

In one sentenceRule 5.548 requires the court to warn a witness about self-incrimination and sets how immunity may be granted in each kind of juvenile proceeding.

Full Text of Rule 5.548

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

(a) Privilege against self-incrimination
If a person is called as a witness and it appears to the court that the testimony or other evidence being sought may tend to incriminate the witness, the court must advise the witness of the privilege against self-incrimination and of the possible consequences of testifying. The court must also inform the witness of the right to representation by counsel and, if indigent, of the right to have counsel appointed.
(b) Authority of judge to grant immunity
If a witness refuses to answer a question or to produce evidence based on a claim of the privilege against self-incrimination, a judge may grant immunity to the witness under (c) or (d) and order the question answered or the evidence produced.
(c) Request for immunity—section 602 proceedings
In proceedings under section 602, the prosecuting attorney may make a written or oral request on the record that the court order a witness to answer a question or produce evidence. The court must then proceed under Penal Code section 1324.
(1) After complying with an order to answer a question or produce evidence and if, but for those Penal Code sections or this rule, the witness would have been privileged to withhold the answer given or the evidence produced, no testimony or other information compelled under the order or information directly or indirectly derived from the testimony or other information may be used against the witness in any criminal case, including any juvenile court proceeding under section 602.
(2) The prosecuting attorney may request an order granting the witness use or transactional immunity.
(d) Request for immunity—section 300 or 601 proceedings
In proceedings under section 300 or 601, the prosecuting attorney or petitioner may make a written or oral request on the record that the judge order a witness to answer a question or produce evidence. They may also make the request jointly.
(1) If the request is not made jointly, the other party must be given the opportunity to show why immunity is not to be granted and the judge may grant or deny the request as deemed appropriate.
(2) If jointly made, the judge must grant the request unless the judge finds that to do so would be clearly contrary to the public interest. The terms of a grant of immunity must be stated in the record.
(3) After complying with the order and if, but for this rule, the witness would have been privileged to withhold the answer given or the evidence produced, any answer given, evidence produced, or information derived there from must not be used against the witness in a juvenile court or criminal proceeding.
(e) No immunity from perjury or contempt
Notwithstanding (c) or (d), a witness may be subject to proceedings under the juvenile court law or to criminal prosecution for perjury, false swearing, or contempt committed in answering or failing to answer or in producing or failing to produce evidence in accordance with the order.
End

Plain-English Summary

Where it appears that testimony being sought may tend to incriminate a witness, the court must advise them of the privilege against self-incrimination and the possible consequences of testifying — and of the right to counsel, appointed if they are indigent.

Where the witness then refuses to answer or produce evidence on that ground, a judge may grant immunity and order the question answered. In delinquency proceedings the prosecuting attorney requests it and the court proceeds under the Penal Code; the witness may be granted use or transactional immunity, and compelled testimony — or information derived from it — may not be used against them in any criminal case, including a juvenile delinquency proceeding.

In dependency and status-offence proceedings the prosecutor or petitioner may request, jointly or alone. If not joint, the other party gets an opportunity to show why immunity should not be granted, and the judge decides. If joint, the judge must grant it unless doing so would be clearly contrary to the public interest — with the terms stated in the record.

Immunity has a limit: it does not protect against proceedings or prosecution for perjury, false swearing, or contempt committed in answering or failing to answer, or in producing or failing to produce evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a witness might incriminate themselves?

The court must advise them of the privilege against self-incrimination and the possible consequences of testifying, and inform them of the right to counsel — appointed if they are indigent.

Who can ask for a witness to be given immunity?

In delinquency, the prosecuting attorney. In dependency or status-offence proceedings, the prosecuting attorney or the petitioner, separately or jointly.

Does immunity cover lying under oath?

No. A witness may still face juvenile proceedings or criminal prosecution for perjury, false swearing, or contempt committed in answering or failing to answer, or in producing or failing to produce evidence.

Amendment History

Rule 5.548 amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as rule 1421 effective January 1, 1990; previously amended effective January 1, 1998.

(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 1998.) (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2007.)

Source & verification. Rule text is reproduced verbatim from the Judicial Council of California. Adopted by the Judicial Council of California. Last verified September 10, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: immunity witness juvenile court Californiaprivilege against self incrimination juvenileuse immunity Penal Code 1324