§ 809.Defendant Guilty of Usurping Or Intruding Or Unlawfully Holding Office, Franchise Or Privilege
Title 10. Actions In Particular Cases · Chapter 5. Actions for the Usurpation of an Office or Franchise · Enacted 1872 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of § 809
Plain-English Summary
This section spells out the judgment against a defendant found guilty in a usurpation action. Once the court determines the defendant unlawfully usurped, intruded into, or held an office, franchise, or privilege, the judgment must exclude the defendant from that office, franchise, or privilege and require payment of the costs of the action. Those two consequences are mandatory once guilt is established.
The court then has discretion to go further. It may impose a fine of up to five thousand dollars, which — if collected — goes into the state treasury rather than to the plaintiff or any private complainant. That structure fits the public character of the action: the wrong being remedied is the unlawful exercise of a public office or franchise, so the penalty flows to the public treasury.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must happen once a defendant is found guilty of usurping an office or franchise?
The court must render judgment excluding the defendant from the office, franchise, or privilege and requiring payment of the costs of the action.
Can the court also impose a fine?
Yes, in its discretion, up to five thousand dollars.
Who receives the fine if one is imposed?
The state treasury, not the plaintiff or any private party who brought the matter to the Attorney General's attention.
Is the fine mandatory?
No. Exclusion from the office and payment of costs are required once guilt is found; the fine is left to the court's discretion.
Amendment History
Enacted 1872.