RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 803.Action Brought By Attorney General

Title 10. Actions In Particular Cases · Chapter 5. Actions for the Usurpation of an Office or Franchise · Last amended 1907 · Last verified July 28, 2026

In one sentenceSection 803 authorizes the Attorney General to sue, on the People's behalf, anyone who usurps or unlawfully holds a public office or franchise or any corporation that unlawfully exercises a franchise, and requires the Attorney General to act whenever there's reason to believe this has happened or the Governor so directs.

Full Text of § 803

Text size

An action may be brought by the attorney-general, in the name of the people of this state, upon his own information, or upon a complaint of a private party, against any person who usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises any public office, civil or military, or any franchise, or against any corporation, either de jure or de facto, which usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises any franchise, within this state. And the attorney-general must bring the action, whenever he has reason to believe that any such office or franchise has been usurped, intruded into, or unlawfully held or exercised by any person, or when he is directed to do so by the governor.

Plain-English Summary

This section names who brings California's statutory quo warranto-style action and against whom. The Attorney General sues in the name of the People, either on the Attorney General's own information or on a private party's complaint, against a person who usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises a public office (civil or military) or any franchise. The same action reaches a corporation, whether formally organized or operating as a corporation in fact, that unlawfully holds or exercises a franchise within California.

The Attorney General's role here isn't purely discretionary. Section 803 says the Attorney General must bring the action whenever there's reason to believe an office or franchise has been usurped, intruded into, or unlawfully held, or whenever the Governor directs it. A private citizen can trigger the process by bringing a complaint to the Attorney General's attention, but the decision to proceed — and the conduct of the litigation — rests with the Attorney General.

Later sections in this chapter build on that structure. Section 804 lets the Attorney General also name the person rightly entitled to the office, § 810 lets the Attorney General require an undertaking from a private complainant, and § 811 gives local governing bodies their own parallel right to sue over franchises within their territory.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can bring this action against someone occupying an office or franchise unlawfully?

The Attorney General, suing in the name of the People of California, either on the Attorney General's own information or on a private party's complaint.

Is the Attorney General required to bring this action, or is it discretionary?

Section 803 says the Attorney General must bring the action whenever there's reason to believe an office or franchise has been usurped or unlawfully held, or whenever the Governor directs it.

Can this action be brought against a corporation as well as an individual?

Yes. It reaches any corporation, whether formally organized or operating as one in fact, that usurps or unlawfully exercises a franchise in California.

Can a private citizen start this process?

A private party can bring a complaint to the Attorney General, who then decides whether to bring the action. Section 810 lets the Attorney General require that private complainant to post an undertaking.

Amendment History

Amended by Stats. 1907, Ch. 324.

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the Deering's California Codes Annotated / vLex. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 28, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: quo warranto californiaattorney general usurpation of officefranchise usurpation lawsuit california