§ 2106.Uniformity of construction
Title 7. Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act · Enacted 1979 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 2106
Plain-English Summary
Uniform acts carry this kind of clause almost as a matter of course, and this title is no exception. The statute directs that it be applied and construed to carry out its general purpose, making the law on this subject uniform among the states that enact it. In practice, that means a court reading an ambiguous phrase in this title should weigh how other states applying the same model act have read that phrase, rather than treating California's version as though it existed in isolation.
The reason for the clause tracks the reason the underlying act exists. Federal tax liens and the other liens this title covers touch property and business entities operating across state lines, and the IRS, lenders, and title searchers all benefit from filing rules that behave the same way whether the property or the debtor happens to sit in California or somewhere else. This section does not add a filing requirement, a fee, or a deadline of its own; it is an interpretive instruction aimed at keeping the rest of the title from drifting away from its sister-state counterparts over time.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does Section 2106 tell a court to do when interpreting this title?
Apply and construe the title in a way that keeps it uniform with how other states have construed the same model act.
Does this section change any filing procedure or fee?
No. It is an interpretive instruction, not a rule about how or where to file anything.
Why does a uniform act include a clause like this?
Because the point of adopting a uniform act is for the law to work the same way across every state that enacts it, and a construction clause keeps courts from reading it inconsistently with sister states.
Amendment History
(Added by Stats.1979, c. 330, p. 1185, § 1.)