§ 2028.050.Objection to question calling for privileged information or protected
Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 11. Deposition by Written Questions · Enacted 2004 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 2028.050
Plain-English Summary
Objections based on privilege or protected work product get their own track, separate from ordinary form objections, because the stakes are different: answering first and objecting later can't undo a disclosure already made. A party who believes a question calls for privileged information or material protected under the Discovery Act's work-product chapter has to serve a specific objection on that ground within 15 days after the question is served, or lose the right to object at all.
Once that objection is served, the burden shifts to the party who asked the question. That party can move the court for an order overruling the objection, again backed by a meet-and-confer declaration, but unlike a form objection, the deposition officer can't propound the question at all while a privilege or work-product objection is pending, not even conditionally. The question stays off the table unless and until the court overrules the objection. And just as with form objections, the court must impose a monetary sanction on the losing side of that motion, whether it's the party who unsuccessfully sought to overrule the objection or the one who unsuccessfully opposed the motion, unless the loser acted with substantial justification or a sanction would be unjust.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long does a party have to object that a written-deposition question calls for privileged information?
15 days after the question is served, or the objection is waived.
Can the deposition officer ask a question while a privilege objection is pending?
No. Unlike a form objection, the officer can't propound a question subject to a pending privilege or work-product objection unless the court has overruled it.
Who has to bring the motion to resolve a privilege objection?
The party who propounded the question moves the court for an order overruling the objection, supported by a meet-and-confer declaration.
What happens to the losing party on a motion to overrule this kind of objection?
The court must impose a monetary sanction against whoever unsuccessfully makes or opposes the motion, absent substantial justification or unjust circumstances.
Amendment History
(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005.)