§ 2016.040.Meet and confer declaration; requirements
Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 1. General Provisions · Last amended 2026 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of § 2016.040
Plain-English Summary
California discovery motions do not go straight to a judge; the parties have to try to work things out first, and this section describes what proof of that effort looks like. A declaration supporting a discovery motion must state facts showing a reasonable and good-faith attempt to resolve each issue the motion raises, and that attempt can happen in person, by telephone, or by videoconference.
The declaration also has to say whether the moving party has met and conferred, including through an electronic communication, about retaining a certified shorthand reporter for the motion hearing. That added requirement does not force anyone to hire a reporter; it just makes sure the parties talked about the option before showing up in court.
This section functions as connective tissue for the rest of the Act. Rather than repeating the meet-and-confer requirement in every chapter that authorizes a discovery motion, those other sections cross-reference this one instead of repeating it, so the same standard for what counts as a good-faith effort applies uniformly across interrogatories, depositions, document demands, and every other discovery mechanism.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must a meet and confer declaration show?
Facts establishing a reasonable and good-faith attempt, made in person, by telephone, or by videoconference, to informally resolve each issue the motion raises.
Does the declaration have to address a court reporter for the hearing?
Yes, it must state whether the moving party has met and conferred, including electronically, about retaining a certified shorthand reporter, though nothing in the section requires hiring one.
Why do so many other discovery sections cross-reference this one?
Because this section sets the uniform standard for the meet-and-confer showing required before a discovery motion, other sections authorizing such motions incorporate it by reference instead of repeating the requirement.
Is an in-person meeting the only acceptable way to meet and confer?
No, the section also recognizes a good-faith attempt made by telephone or by videoconference.
Amendment History
(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005. Amended by Stats.2025, c. 64 (A.B.711), § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 2026; Stats.2025, c. 200 (A.B.1521), § 12, eff. Jan. 1, 2026.)