RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 2017.220.Sexual harassment, assault or battery allegations; monetary sanctions

Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 2. Scope of Discovery · Article 2. Scope of Discovery in Specific Contexts · Enacted 2004 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 2017.220 requires a party seeking discovery of a sexual harassment, assault, or battery plaintiff's sexual conduct with someone other than the alleged perpetrator to show good cause and relevance by noticed motion, never ex parte, and mandates sanctions against an unsuccessful movant or opponent absent substantial justification.

Full Text of § 2017.220

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a) In any civil action alleging conduct that constitutes sexual harassment, sexual assault, or sexual battery, any party seeking discovery concerning the plaintiff's sexual conduct with individuals other than the alleged perpetrator shall establish specific facts showing that there is good cause for that discovery, and that the matter sought to be discovered is relevant to the subject matter of the action and reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. This showing shall be made by a noticed motion, accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040, and shall not be made or considered by the court at an ex parte hearing.
(b) The court shall impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion for discovery under subdivision (a), unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust.

Plain-English Summary

Cases alleging sexual harassment, sexual assault, or sexual battery raise an obvious risk that discovery could be used to intimidate or embarrass the plaintiff by probing that person's sexual history with people who have nothing to do with the case, and this section builds in a screening step before that kind of discovery can proceed. A party seeking discovery of the plaintiff's sexual conduct with someone other than the alleged perpetrator must establish specific facts showing good cause for the discovery and showing that it is relevant to the subject matter of the action and reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence.

That showing cannot be made informally or behind closed doors. It has to come through a noticed motion, accompanied by the standard meet and confer declaration, and the section expressly bars a court from making or considering this showing at an ex parte hearing, guaranteeing the plaintiff notice and a chance to respond before any such discovery is ordered.

As with other discovery-limiting motions in this Act, the section backs its procedural requirements with a mandatory sanction: a court must impose a monetary sanction against a party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion for this kind of discovery, unless the losing side acted with substantial justification or a sanction would otherwise be unjust.

Frequently Asked Questions

What must a party show before discovering a plaintiff's sexual conduct in a harassment or assault case?

Specific facts establishing good cause for the discovery and showing it is relevant to the subject matter of the action and reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence.

Can this kind of discovery be sought or granted at an ex parte hearing?

No, the showing must be made by noticed motion and cannot be made or considered at an ex parte hearing.

Does the plaintiff's conduct with the alleged perpetrator fall under this heightened standard?

No, the section specifically addresses discovery of the plaintiff's sexual conduct with individuals other than the alleged perpetrator.

What happens if the motion for this discovery is unsuccessful?

The court must impose a monetary sanction against whichever side loses, unless that side acted with substantial justification or a sanction would otherwise be unjust.

Amendment History

(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005.)

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the West's Annotated California Codes / Thomson Reuters. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: discovery of plaintiff sexual history californiasexual harassment case discovery motion good cause