RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 2017.210.Insurance carriers; nature, limits or disputes regarding coverage

Title 4. Civil Discovery Act · Chapter 2. Scope of Discovery · Article 2. Scope of Discovery in Specific Contexts · Enacted 2004 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 2017.210 allows a party to discover the existence and contents of an insurance agreement that might cover a judgment in the action, including the carrier's identity, coverage limits, and whether coverage is disputed, though not the substance of that dispute, and provides that disclosure does not itself make the agreement admissible at trial.

Full Text of § 2017.210

Text size

A party may obtain discovery of the existence and contents of any agreement under which any insurance carrier may be liable to satisfy in whole or in part a judgment that may be entered in the action or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made to satisfy the judgment. This discovery may include the identity of the carrier and the nature and limits of the coverage. A party may also obtain discovery as to whether that insurance carrier is disputing the agreement's coverage of the claim involved in the action, but not as to the nature and substance of that dispute. Information concerning the insurance agreement is not by reason of disclosure admissible in evidence at trial.

Plain-English Summary

Knowing whether an opposing party has insurance, and how much of it, shapes how a case gets litigated and settled, and this section makes that information discoverable as a matter of course. A party may discover the existence and contents of any agreement under which an insurance carrier may be liable to satisfy all or part of a judgment, or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made toward one, including the carrier's identity and the nature and limits of coverage.

Discovery under this section also reaches whether the carrier is disputing coverage of the claim at all, but it stops there; a party cannot use this section to discover the substance of that coverage dispute, only its existence. That line keeps the underlying tort or contract case separate from a coverage fight that may end up litigated on its own, often in a different proceeding.

Finally, the section makes clear that none of this changes the rules of admissibility at trial. Information about an insurance agreement obtained through this kind of discovery is not, by reason of that disclosure alone, admissible in evidence, preserving the traditional rule that a jury generally should not hear about a defendant's insurance coverage when deciding liability or damages.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a party find out whether the opposing party has liability insurance?

Yes, Section 2017.210 makes the existence and contents of a covering insurance agreement discoverable, including the carrier's identity and coverage limits.

Can a party discover whether the insurer is disputing coverage?

Yes, whether the carrier disputes coverage is discoverable, but the nature and substance of that dispute is not.

Does discovering an insurance agreement make it admissible at trial?

No, the section specifically provides that information about the agreement is not, by reason of its disclosure in discovery, admissible in evidence at trial.

Amendment History

(Added by Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 23, operative July 1, 2005.)

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the West's Annotated California Codes / Thomson Reuters. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: discovery of insurance policy california lawsuitinsurance coverage discoverable civil procedure