RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 1775.Legislative Findings and Declaration

Title 11.6. Civil Action Mediation · Enacted 1993 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 1775 sets out the Legislature's findings behind California's court-connected civil mediation program, explaining why mediation belongs alongside judicial arbitration as an early, cost-saving alternative to trial and directing a survey to track the savings the program produces.

Full Text of § 1775

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)

The Legislature finds and declares that:
(a) The peaceful resolution of disputes in a fair, timely, appropriate, and cost-effective manner is an essential function of the judicial branch of state government under Article VI of the California Constitution.
(b) In the case of many disputes, litigation culminating in a trial is costly, time consuming, and stressful for the parties involved. Many disputes can be resolved in a fair and equitable manner through less formal processes.
(c) Alternative processes for reducing the cost, time, and stress of dispute resolution, such as mediation, have been effectively used in California and elsewhere. In appropriate cases mediation provides parties with a simplified and economical procedure for obtaining prompt and equitable resolution of their disputes and a greater opportunity to participate directly in resolving these disputes. Mediation may also assist to reduce the backlog of cases burdening the judicial system. It is in the public interest for mediation to be encouraged and used where appropriate by the courts.
(d) Mediation and similar alternative processes can have the greatest benefit for the parties in a civil action when used early, before substantial discovery and other litigation costs have been incurred. Where appropriate, participants in disputes should be encouraged to utilize mediation and other alternatives to trial for resolving their differences in the early stages of a civil action.
(e) As a pilot project in Los Angeles County and in other counties which elect to apply this title, courts should be able to refer cases to appropriate dispute resolution processes such as judicial arbitration and mediation as an alternative to trial, consistent with the parties' right to obtain a trial if a dispute is not resolved through an alternative process.
(f) The purpose of this title is to encourage the use of court-annexed alternative dispute resolution methods in general, and mediation in particular. It is estimated that the average cost to the court for processing a civil case of the kind described in Section 1775.3 through judgment is three thousand nine hundred forty- three dollars ($3,943) for each judge day, and that a substantial portion of this cost can be saved if these cases are resolved before trial.
The Judicial Council, through the Administrative Office of the Courts, shall conduct a survey to determine the number of cases resolved by alternative dispute resolution authorized by this title, and shall estimate the resulting savings realized by the courts and the parties. The results of the survey shall be included in the report submitted pursuant to Section 1775.14. The programs authorized by this title shall be deemed successful if they result in estimated savings of at least two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) to the courts and corresponding savings to the parties.

Plain-English Summary

This section opens Title 11.6 with the Legislature's own reasoning for creating a mediation program inside the civil courts. Resolving disputes in an equitable and prompt manner is a core job of the judicial branch, but a trial is often costly, slow, and hard on the people involved, while many of the same disputes can be settled in an equitable way through a less formal process. Mediation, the Legislature found, gives parties a simpler, cheaper way to reach a resolution and a bigger hand in shaping it themselves, and used early in a case, before the parties have sunk money into discovery and motion practice, it does the most good. Los Angeles County became the pilot site, with other counties free to opt in, so courts could steer suitable cases toward mediation or judicial arbitration as alternatives to trial, without taking away anyone's right to a trial if the case doesn't settle.

The section also builds in a way to check whether the idea is working. It cites an estimated cost of $3,943 per judge day to push a case of the kind described in Section 1775.3 through to judgment, and directs the Judicial Council, through the Administrative Office of the Courts, to survey how many cases the program resolves and estimate the resulting savings for the courts and for the parties. Those results feed into the report Section 1775.14 requires, and the Legislature set a benchmark for success: at least $250,000 in estimated savings to the courts, with corresponding savings to the litigants.

Frequently Asked Questions

What problem is Section 1775 trying to solve?

The cost, delay, and stress of resolving civil disputes through trial, which the Legislature found many disputes don't need in order to reach a fair outcome.

Why does the program start in Los Angeles County?

The Legislature set it up as a pilot project there, while letting other counties elect to apply Title 11.6 to their own cases.

Does mediation take away a party's right to a trial?

No. Section 1775 frames mediation as an alternative parties can pursue while keeping the right to a trial if the dispute isn't resolved.

What must the Judicial Council do because of this section?

Survey how many cases the program resolves, estimate the resulting savings, and include those findings in the report Section 1775.14 requires.

What benchmark did the Legislature set for the program to count as successful?

Estimated savings of at least $250,000 to the courts, with corresponding savings to the parties.

Amendment History

Added by Stats. 1993, Ch. 1261, Sec. 4. Effective January 1, 1994.

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from the Deering's California Codes Annotated / vLex. Enacted by the California Legislature. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: california civil action mediation findingscourt annexed mediation purpose los angeles