Rule 3.923.Selection and qualification of referee
Division 9. References · Chapter 2. Court-Ordered Reference Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 639 · Adopted 2007 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.923
Plain-English Summary
Rule 3.923 is the Chapter 2 twin of rule 3.903, applying the identical selection standard to a reference the court orders rather than one the parties chose. The court still appoints the referee the way Code of Civil Procedure section 640 provides, so the fact that the reference began by court order rather than by agreement does not loosen the selection process the Legislature set out.
The bar-membership floor carries over unchanged as well. If the referee is a former California judicial officer, that person has to be an active or inactive member of the State Bar. A litigant facing a section 639 reference they may not have wanted still gets the same assurance a stipulating party gets: whoever the court appoints went through section 640's process, and any retired judge among the candidates remains connected to the bar's professional structure.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Rule 3.923 set a different selection process than Rule 3.903?
No. Both rules point to Code of Civil Procedure section 640; Rule 3.923 applies it to court-ordered references under section 639 rather than stipulated references under section 638.
Must a retired judge appointed as a section 639 referee belong to the State Bar?
Yes, as an active or inactive member.
Does a party get less say over referee qualifications in a court-ordered reference than a stipulated one?
No. The same section 640 selection procedure and bar-membership requirement apply to both.
Amendment History
Rule 3.923 adopted effective January 1, 2007.