Rule 3.2235.Application
Division 22. Petitions Under the California Environmental Quality Act · Chapter 2. California Environmental Quality Act Proceedings Involving Streamlined CEQA Projects · Article 2. CEQA Challenges to Approval of Sacramento Arena Project · Adopted 2014 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.2235
Plain-English Summary
Rule 3.2235 is the gateway rule for Article 2, the set of provisions the Judicial Council adopted specifically for CEQA litigation over the Sacramento arena project. It marks the boundary of that article’s reach: any action or proceeding trying to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the certification of the project’s environmental impact report, or any of the approvals the project received, falls inside it.
That boundary matters because the rules in this article — covering service of the petition and the list of responsible agencies — exist to implement the Sacramento arena project’s special CEQA treatment procedurally. A case that fits the description in this rule follows Article 2’s specific service timeline in Rule 3.2236 rather than the more general service provisions in Rule 3.2222, while a case that does not fit stays under the general streamlined CEQA rules instead.
Frequently Asked Questions
What kinds of cases does Article 2 of the streamlined CEQA rules cover?
Actions attacking, reviewing, setting aside, voiding, or annulling the certification of the environmental impact report or the project approvals for the Sacramento arena project, as Rule 3.2235 defines.
Does the general streamlined CEQA service rule apply to Sacramento arena project cases?
Amendment History
Rule 3.2235 adopted effective July 1, 2014.