RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 3.2235.Application

Division 22. Petitions Under the California Environmental Quality Act · Chapter 2. California Environmental Quality Act Proceedings Involving Streamlined CEQA Projects · Article 2. CEQA Challenges to Approval of Sacramento Arena Project · Adopted 2014 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceRule 3.2235 defines the reach of Article 2’s special procedures, applying them to any action attacking, reviewing, setting aside, voiding, or annulling the environmental impact report certification or project approvals for the Sacramento arena project.

Full Text of Rule 3.2235

Text size

This article governs any action or proceeding brought to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the certification of the environmental impact report or any project approvals for the Sacramento arena project.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 3.2235 is the gateway rule for Article 2, the set of provisions the Judicial Council adopted specifically for CEQA litigation over the Sacramento arena project. It marks the boundary of that article’s reach: any action or proceeding trying to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the certification of the project’s environmental impact report, or any of the approvals the project received, falls inside it.

That boundary matters because the rules in this article — covering service of the petition and the list of responsible agencies — exist to implement the Sacramento arena project’s special CEQA treatment procedurally. A case that fits the description in this rule follows Article 2’s specific service timeline in Rule 3.2236 rather than the more general service provisions in Rule 3.2222, while a case that does not fit stays under the general streamlined CEQA rules instead.

Frequently Asked Questions

What kinds of cases does Article 2 of the streamlined CEQA rules cover?

Actions attacking, reviewing, setting aside, voiding, or annulling the certification of the environmental impact report or the project approvals for the Sacramento arena project, as Rule 3.2235 defines.

Does the general streamlined CEQA service rule apply to Sacramento arena project cases?

No. Rule 3.2222(c) routes service in Sacramento arena project cases to the specific procedure in Rule 3.2236 instead of the general rule.

Amendment History

Rule 3.2235 adopted effective July 1, 2014.

Source & verification. Rule text is reproduced verbatim from the Judicial Council of California. Adopted by the Judicial Council of California. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: Sacramento arena project CEQA rulesscope of Article 2 streamlined CEQA rulesCRC rule 3.2235 application