Rule 3.1327.Motions to quash or to stay action in summary proceeding involving possession of real property
Division 11. Law and Motion · Chapter 6. Particular Motions · Article 1. Pleading and Venue Motions · Last amended 2016 · Last verified July 29, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3.1327
Plain-English Summary
Unlawful detainer and the other summary possession proceedings under Code of Civil Procedure part 3, title 3, chapter 4, commencing at section 1159, move faster than ordinary civil cases because possession of real property is at stake and delay hurts whoever holds the stronger claim. A party facing that kind of action still needs a way to challenge the court's jurisdiction through a motion to quash service, or to argue the case belongs in a different forum through a motion to stay or dismiss for inconvenient forum, so rule 3.1327 fits those challenges into the compressed timeline. Notice of either motion must comply with Code of Civil Procedure sections 1010.6 or 1013, and 1167.4, the statutes governing service in these summary proceedings.
Opposition does not have to be written. Rule 3.1327(b) allows a party to oppose or reply orally at the hearing itself. A party who wants the court to consider written opposition in advance instead has to get it filed and served on or before the court day before the hearing, using personal delivery, electronic service, fax transmission, express mail, or another method under Code of Civil Procedure sections 1010, 1010.6, 1011, 1012, or 1013 reasonably calculated to reach the other side by the close of business that day. Even then, rule 3.1327(c) leaves the court discretion to consider written opposition filed later than that deadline.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a motion to quash service in a California unlawful detainer case?
A motion challenging the court's jurisdiction over the party based on defective service of the summons, governed procedurally by rule 3.1327.
How much notice do you get for a motion to stay a California unlawful detainer action for inconvenient forum?
Notice must comply with Code of Civil Procedure sections 1010.6 or 1013, and 1167.4, under rule 3.1327(a).
Do you have to file written opposition before a California unlawful detainer motion hearing?
No. Rule 3.1327(b) allows opposition to be made orally at the hearing; written opposition filed and served by the court day before the hearing is an option if a party wants the court to consider it in advance.
Can a California court still consider unlawful detainer opposition filed after the deadline?
Yes. Rule 3.1327(c) gives the court discretion to consider written opposition filed later than the court day before the hearing.
Amendment History
Rule 3.1327 amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted effective January 1, 2009.