RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 3.1327.Motions to quash or to stay action in summary proceeding involving possession of real property

Division 11. Law and Motion · Chapter 6. Particular Motions · Article 1. Pleading and Venue Motions · Last amended 2016 · Last verified July 29, 2026

In one sentenceRule 3.1327 sets the notice and opposition procedure for motions to quash service or to stay or dismiss an unlawful detainer-type possession action for inconvenient forum, compressing the usual paperwork deadlines to match the fast pace of summary possession proceedings.

Full Text of Rule 3.1327

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

(a) Notice In an unlawful detainer action or other action brought under chapter 4 of title 3 of part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure (commencing with section 1159), notice of a motion to quash service of summons on the ground of lack of jurisdiction or to stay or dismiss the action on the ground of inconvenient forum must be given in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure sections 1010.6 or 1013 and 1167.4. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2016.)
(b) Opposition and reply at hearing Any opposition to the motion and any reply to an opposition may be made orally at the time of hearing or in writing as set forth in (c).
(c) Written opposition in advance of hearing If a party seeks to have a written opposition considered in advance of the hearing, the written opposition must be filed and served on or before the court day before the hearing. Service must be by personal delivery, electronic service, fax transmission, express mail, or other means consistent with Code of Civil Procedure sections 1010, 1010.6, 1011, 1012, and 1013, and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of business on the court day before the hearing. The court, in its discretion, may consider written opposition filed later. (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2016.)

Plain-English Summary

Unlawful detainer and the other summary possession proceedings under Code of Civil Procedure part 3, title 3, chapter 4, commencing at section 1159, move faster than ordinary civil cases because possession of real property is at stake and delay hurts whoever holds the stronger claim. A party facing that kind of action still needs a way to challenge the court's jurisdiction through a motion to quash service, or to argue the case belongs in a different forum through a motion to stay or dismiss for inconvenient forum, so rule 3.1327 fits those challenges into the compressed timeline. Notice of either motion must comply with Code of Civil Procedure sections 1010.6 or 1013, and 1167.4, the statutes governing service in these summary proceedings.

Opposition does not have to be written. Rule 3.1327(b) allows a party to oppose or reply orally at the hearing itself. A party who wants the court to consider written opposition in advance instead has to get it filed and served on or before the court day before the hearing, using personal delivery, electronic service, fax transmission, express mail, or another method under Code of Civil Procedure sections 1010, 1010.6, 1011, 1012, or 1013 reasonably calculated to reach the other side by the close of business that day. Even then, rule 3.1327(c) leaves the court discretion to consider written opposition filed later than that deadline.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a motion to quash service in a California unlawful detainer case?

A motion challenging the court's jurisdiction over the party based on defective service of the summons, governed procedurally by rule 3.1327.

How much notice do you get for a motion to stay a California unlawful detainer action for inconvenient forum?

Notice must comply with Code of Civil Procedure sections 1010.6 or 1013, and 1167.4, under rule 3.1327(a).

Do you have to file written opposition before a California unlawful detainer motion hearing?

No. Rule 3.1327(b) allows opposition to be made orally at the hearing; written opposition filed and served by the court day before the hearing is an option if a party wants the court to consider it in advance.

Can a California court still consider unlawful detainer opposition filed after the deadline?

Yes. Rule 3.1327(c) gives the court discretion to consider written opposition filed later than the court day before the hearing.

Amendment History

Rule 3.1327 amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted effective January 1, 2009.

Source & verification. Rule text is reproduced verbatim from the Judicial Council of California. Adopted by the Judicial Council of California. Last verified July 29, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: motion to quash unlawful detainer Californiainconvenient forum unlawful detainer Californiaopposition deadline unlawful detainer motion California