RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

767.855.Dismissal if adjudication not in child’s best interest.

Subch. IX: Paternity · Last amended 2019 · Current through 2025 Wisconsin Act 247 · Last verified September 8, 2026

In one sentenceSection 767.855 lets the court dismiss a paternity action against a man where a judicial determination would not be in the child's best interest, whatever the genetic tests say.

Full Text of Section 767.855

Text size

Except as provided in s. 767.863 (1m), at any time in an action to establish the paternity of a child, upon the motion of a party or guardian ad litem, the court or supplemental court commissioner under s. 757.675 (2) (g) may, if the court or supplemental court commissioner determines that a judicial determination of whether a male is the father of the child is not in the best interest of the child, dismiss the action with respect to the male, regardless of whether genetic tests have been performed or what the results of the tests, if performed, were. Notwithstanding ss. 767.813 (5g) (form) 4., 767.84 (1) and (2), 767.863 (2), 767.865 (2), and 767.88 (4), if genetic tests have not yet been performed with respect to the male, the court or supplemental court commissioner is not required to order those genetic tests.
End

Amendment History

Wisconsin prints each section’s legislative history as a single “History” line naming every act that created or amended it, and every renumbering. It is reproduced verbatim below.

History: 1997 a. 191; 2001 a. 61; 2005 a. 443 s. 202; Stats. 2005 s. 767.855; 2019 a. 95.

Plain-English Summary

A short section with a long reach, and the clearest statement in the subchapter that biology does not always win.

At any time in an action to establish paternity, on the motion of a party or the guardian ad litem, the court — or a supplemental court commissioner — may dismiss the action with respect to a male if it determines that a judicial determination of whether he is the father is not in the child's best interest. The statute says this applies regardless of whether genetic tests have been performed, and regardless of what they showed.

It also releases the court from the testing obligations that otherwise run through the subchapter: where tests have not yet been done, the court is not required to order them, notwithstanding the summons notice, the general testing section, the first appearance, the deceased-respondent provision and the pretrial hearing.

The typical case is a child with a settled family life and a man who may or may not be biologically related to them. This section lets a court decline to run the test rather than run it and then try to unring the bell.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a Wisconsin paternity case be dismissed even if the man is the father?

Yes. The court may dismiss the action with respect to a male if it determines that a judicial determination of paternity is not in the child's best interest, regardless of whether genetic tests were performed or what they showed.

Can the court refuse to order a DNA test?

Where tests have not yet been performed, the court is not required to order them if it makes the best-interest determination under this section.

Who can ask for this?

A party or the guardian ad litem, by motion, at any time in the action.

Source & verification. The statutory text, official notes and history are reproduced verbatim from the Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 767 (Wis. Stat. § 767.855), published by the Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau. Current through 2025 Wisconsin Act 247. The plain-English summary is original and written by us. Last verified September 8, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: dismiss paternity best interest Wisconsinrefuse DNA test best interest child767.855 dismissal