767.055.Uniform Divorce Recognition Act.
Subch. I: Definitions, Scope, Jurisdiction, and Recognition of Judgments · Last amended 2005 · Current through 2025 Wisconsin Act 247 · Last verified September 8, 2026
Full Text of Section 767.055
Amendment History
Wisconsin prints each section’s legislative history as a single “History” line naming every act that created or amended it, and every renumbering. It is reproduced verbatim below.
History: 1977 c. 105; 1979 c. 32 s. 50; Stats. 1979 s. 767.22; 1993 a. 486; 2005 a. 443 s. 85; Stats. 2005 s. 767.055.
Plain-English Summary
This section closes the migratory divorce. If both parties to the marriage were domiciled in Wisconsin when the proceeding was commenced, and the other jurisdiction therefore lacked subject matter jurisdiction, the divorce it granted is of no force or effect in this state.
Proving domicile is made practical by a presumption. Proof that the person who obtained the divorce was domiciled in Wisconsin within 12 months before the proceeding began and resumed residence here within 18 months after leaving — or that they kept a residence here the whole time they were away — is prima facie evidence that they were domiciled in Wisconsin when the proceeding was commenced.
The section is a uniform act and says so: it is to be interpreted to make the law uniform among the states that enact it, and it may be cited by that name.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is an out-of-state divorce valid if both spouses lived in Wisconsin?
Not if the other jurisdiction lacked subject matter jurisdiction because both parties were domiciled in Wisconsin when the proceeding was commenced. Such a divorce is of no force or effect in this state.
How is Wisconsin domicile proved?
Proof that the person was domiciled here within 12 months before the divorce proceeding began and resumed residence here within 18 months after leaving — or kept a residence here throughout — is prima facie evidence of domicile at commencement.
What is this section called?
The Uniform Divorce Recognition Act. The section says so itself.