Rule 94.Affirmative Defenses
Last verified June 28, 2026
Full Text of Rule 94
Plain-English Summary
Rule 94 makes certain defenses “use it or lose it.” In responding to a pleading, a party must set forth affirmatively any defense of avoidance or affirmative defense — the rule names a long list, including accord and satisfaction, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel, failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, laches, license, payment, release, res judicata, statute of frauds, statute of limitations, and waiver. A defense not pleaded is generally waived.
The rule adds a special provision for insurance. When a suit is on a policy that insures against general hazards but limits that liability by exceptions, the insured need not plead that the loss falls outside an exception; the insurer must specifically allege that the loss came within a particular exception to raise the issue. The burden of proof is left as it stands.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are affirmative defenses under Texas Rule 94?
Defenses that must be pleaded affirmatively, including statute of limitations, res judicata, estoppel, fraud, release, payment, waiver, and any other matter of avoidance. A defense not pleaded is generally waived.
Who pleads a policy exception in an insurance case?
Under Rule 94, the insurer. The insured need not negate the exceptions; the insurer must specifically allege that the loss came within a particular exception to raise the issue.