Rule 65.Substituted Instrument Takes Place of Original
Last verified June 28, 2026
Full Text of Rule 65
Plain-English Summary
Rule 65 explains what happens to the old pleading after an amendment. Unless the substitute is set aside on exceptions, the instrument it replaced is no longer part of the pleadings in the record. The case proceeds on the amended version.
Two situations keep the superseded pleading relevant: when a party complains of, and excepts to, a court error in allowing or superseding the amendment; or when the earlier pleading must be consulted on a question of limitations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does an amended pleading replace the original in Texas?
Yes. Under Rule 65, once amended, the superseded pleading is no longer part of the record — unless a court error in allowing the amendment is challenged, or the old pleading is needed on a limitations question.
What if a party successfully excepts to a substituted pleading?
Then Rule 65 does not remove the earlier instrument. If the substitute is set aside on exceptions, the pleading it was meant to replace remains part of the record.
Why would a superseded pleading matter to a limitations defense?
Because Rule 65 keeps a superseded pleading available for that purpose. If the case turns on a question of limitations, the court may still look to the earlier, superseded pleading even though the amendment otherwise replaced it.