Rule 253.Absence of Counsel as Ground for Continuance
Last verified June 28, 2026
Full Text of Rule 253
Plain-English Summary
Rule 253 discourages last-minute delay based on a lawyer's absence. Except as other rules provide, the absence of counsel is not good cause for a continuance or postponement when a case is called for trial. The court may allow it in its discretion, but only on cause shown or on matters within the judge's knowledge or information that are stated on the record.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you get a continuance because your lawyer is unavailable in Texas?
Not as a matter of right. Rule 253 makes absence of counsel a discretionary ground only, allowed on cause shown or on matters the judge states on the record.
Are there exceptions to Rule 253's limit on continuances for absent counsel?
Yes. Rule 253 opens with 'except as provided elsewhere in these rules,' which leaves room for other rules — like the legislative continuance in Rule 254 — to grant a continuance for an absent attorney that Rule 253 alone would not allow.
Can a Texas judge grant a continuance for absent counsel without a written motion?
Yes, in narrow circumstances. Rule 253 lets the court act on matters within its own knowledge or information, stated on the record, rather than requiring a formal motion.