RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 98.002.Liability

Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 98. Liability for Trafficking of Persons · Last amended 2009 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 98.002 makes a trafficker, and anyone who intentionally or knowingly benefits from participating in a trafficking venture, liable to the person trafficked — with acquittal or non-prosecution no defence.

Full Text of § 98.002

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a)A defendant who engages in the trafficking of persons or who intentionally or knowingly benefits from participating in a venture that traffics another person is liable to the person trafficked, as provided by this chapter, for damages arising from the trafficking of that person by the defendant or venture.
(b)It is not a defense to liability under this chapter that a defendant has been acquitted or has not been prosecuted or convicted under Chapter 20A, Penal Code, or has been convicted of a different offense or of a different type or class of offense, for the conduct that is alleged to give rise to liability under this chapter.
End

Plain-English Summary

The cause of action, and the second half of the first sentence is what gives it reach.

A defendant who engages in the trafficking of personsor who intentionally or knowingly benefits from participating in a venture that traffics another personis liable to the person trafficked for damages arising from the trafficking by the defendant or venture.

The beneficiary branch reaches beyond the trafficker. A person who did not traffic anyone but who intentionally or knowingly benefited from participating in a venture that did is liable for the same damages.

That is what makes the chapter useful against the businesses trafficking operates through — the hotel, the transport, the property, the platform — where the direct traffickers are unidentified, unreachable, or without assets.

Both elements are required for that branch: participation in the venture, and a knowing or intentional benefit from it. Providing services to a venture without knowledge is outside it.

Subsection (b) removes the criminal case as a defence entirely. It is not a defence that a defendant has been acquitted, has not been prosecuted or convicted, or has been convicted of a different offense or of a different type or class of offense for the same conduct.

The civil and criminal proceedings are independent, and the burdens differ. An acquittal establishes reasonable doubt, not the absence of the conduct.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can be sued under the Texas trafficking statute?

A person who engages in trafficking, and a person who intentionally or knowingly benefits from participating in a venture that traffics another person.

Does that reach businesses?

Yes, where the business participated in the venture and knowingly or intentionally benefited from it — which is the route used against hotels, transport, and property owners.

Does an acquittal bar the civil claim?

No. Acquittal, non-prosecution, non-conviction, and conviction of a different offence are all expressly not defences.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 309 (H.B. 533), Sec. 1, eff. June 19, 2009.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source