§ 90.056.Response to Motion to Stay
Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 90. Claims Involving Asbestos and Silica · Subchapter B. Asbestos or Silica Trust Claims · Last amended 2015 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 90.056
Plain-English Summary
The claimant's answer to a stay motion, with two available responses.
Not later than the 14th day after the motion is filed, or a date set by court order, the claimant may file a response:
stating and providing proof that the claimant has made the identified trust claim and served the notice and material; or requesting a determination that the fees and expenses, including attorney's fees, for filing the claim exceed the claimant's reasonably anticipated recovery.
The first response defeats the motion factually — the claim was made and disclosed, and there is nothing to stay for.
The second is the same economic relief the trust claim obligation itself provides, available here in answer to a defendant's motion rather than on the claimant's own initiative.
Subsection (b) requires the court to decide it, and adds a condition on relief. Where the court finds the fees and expenses exceed the anticipated recovery, the claimant is not required to make the trust claim but shall provide the court with a verified statement of the exposed person's exposure history to asbestos or silica that is covered by the trust.
The exposure history is the point. Relief from the filing obligation does not relieve the claimant of accounting for the exposure. The defendants learn what the claimant would have told the trust, which is the information that bears on apportionment — and the trust claim is excused only because it would not have paid enough to be worth filing.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I respond to a motion to stay?
Within 14 days, by proving you made the identified trust claim and served the notice and material, or by asking the court to determine that the fees and expenses exceed your reasonably anticipated recovery.
What if the court agrees the claim is not worth filing?
You need not make it, but you must provide the court with a verified statement of the exposed person's exposure history covered by that trust.
Why require the exposure statement?
Because the exposure information is what bears on apportionment. Relief is given from the filing cost, not from accounting for the exposure.
Amendment History
- Added by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 532 (H.B. 1492), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2015.