RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 81.002.Sexual Exploitation Cause of Action

Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 81. Sexual Exploitation by Mental Health Services Provider · Last amended 1993 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 81.002 makes a mental health services provider liable to a patient or former patient for injury arising from sexual contact, sexual exploitation, or therapeutic deception.

Full Text of § 81.002

Text size

A mental health services provider is liable to a patient or former patient of the mental health services provider for damages for sexual exploitation if the patient or former patient suffers, directly or indirectly, a physical, mental, or emotional injury caused by, resulting from, or arising out of:
(1)sexual contact between the patient or former patient and the mental health services provider;
(2)sexual exploitation of the patient or former patient by the mental health services provider; or
(3)therapeutic deception of the patient or former patient by the mental health services provider.
End

Plain-English Summary

The cause of action, and it is stated in three alternatives.

A provider is liable to a patient or former patient for damages if the patient suffers, directly or indirectly, a physical, mental, or emotional injury caused by, resulting from, or arising out of:

sexual contact between the patient and the provider; sexual exploitation of the patient by the provider; or therapeutic deception of the patient by the provider.

"Former patient" is as protected as a current one. The therapeutic relationship creates a dependency that does not end when the sessions do, and the chapter treats it that way — subject to the defence available where treatment ended more than two years before and the person was not emotionally dependent.

The injury may be physical, mental, or emotional, and may be caused directly or indirectly. The damages section then confirms that mental anguish damages are recoverable even if no other injury is shown, which matters because the harm here is characteristically psychological.

The three routes are alternatives, not elements. Any one suffices. Therapeutic deception requires no sexual contact at all — the representation that such contact would be part of treatment is itself actionable.

Consent is not a defence, and neither is the fact that the conduct occurred outside sessions or off the premises.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue a therapist for sexual misconduct in Texas?

Yes. A mental health services provider is liable to a patient or former patient for injury arising from sexual contact, sexual exploitation, or therapeutic deception.

Does it matter that I was a former patient?

No, subject to the defence where treatment ended more than two years before the conduct began and you were not emotionally dependent on the provider.

What if there was no physical contact?

Therapeutic deception — representing that sexual contact would be part of your treatment — is itself a route to liability.

What injuries are covered?

Physical, mental, or emotional injury, caused directly or indirectly.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 573, Sec. 2.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1993.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source