§ 74.151.Liability for Emergency Care
Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 74. Medical Liability · Subchapter D. Emergency Care · Last amended 2019 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 74.151
Plain-English Summary
The Texas Good Samaritan statute, and its protection is broad but conditioned.
A person who in good faith administers emergency care is not liable in civil damages for an act performed during the emergency unless the act is wilfully or wantonly negligent. The section names two examples: a person administering care using an automated external defibrillator, and a volunteer first responder.
Ordinary negligence is protected. Only wilful or wanton negligence — conscious indifference rather than carelessness — defeats the immunity.
The remuneration exception is drawn carefully. The section does not apply to care administered for or in expectation of remuneration — but being legally entitled to receive remuneration does not by itself determine whether the care was administered in anticipation of it. A physician who stops at a roadside accident is not outside the section merely because they could bill for it.
The second exception is narrower and pointed: care by a person at the scene because they or a person they represent as agent was soliciting business or seeking to perform a service for remuneration.
Subsection (e) excludes the person who caused the emergency. The section does not protect a person whose negligent act or omission was a producing cause of the emergency for which care is administered — with a carve-back preserving protection for school districts and their officers and employees acting under a Education Code Subchapter G programme, other than for wilful or intentional misconduct.
Subsections (c) and (d) were deleted in the 2003 reforms.
Frequently Asked Questions
Am I protected if I help at an accident in Texas?
Yes. A person who in good faith administers emergency care is not liable in civil damages unless the act is wilfully or wantonly negligent.
Does it matter if I am a doctor who could bill for it?
Being legally entitled to receive remuneration does not by itself determine whether the care was administered in anticipation of it.
Who is not protected?
Someone administering care for or in expectation of remuneration, someone at the scene because they were soliciting business, and someone whose own negligence was a producing cause of the emergency.
Does it cover using a defibrillator?
Yes. A person administering emergency care using an automated external defibrillator is expressly named.
Amendment History
- Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 959, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 960, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 30, 1993; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 679, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1999. Renumbered from Sec. 74.001 and amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 204, Sec. 10.01, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
- Amended by:
- Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 705 (H.B. 2117), Sec. 1, eff. June 15, 2007.
- Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1321 (S.B. 460), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2013.
- Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 352 (H.B. 18), Sec. 3.01, eff. December 1, 2019.