RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 73.056.Disclosure of Evidence of Falsity

Title 4. Liability in Tort · Chapter 73. Libel · Subchapter B. Correction, Clarification, or Retraction by Publisher · Last amended 2013 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 73.056 lets a publisher ask the requester for reasonably available information showing falsity within 30 days, and bars exemplary damages if the requester fails without good cause to provide it.

Full Text of § 73.056

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a)A person who has been requested to make a correction, clarification, or retraction may ask the person making the request to provide reasonably available information regarding the falsity of the allegedly defamatory statement not later than the 30th day after the date the person receives the request. Any information requested under this section must be provided by the person seeking the correction, clarification, or retraction not later than the 30th day after the date the person receives the request.
(b)If a correction, clarification, or retraction is not made, a person who, without good cause, fails to disclose the information requested under Subsection (a) may not recover exemplary damages, unless the publication was made with actual malice.
End

Plain-English Summary

An information exchange sitting between the request and the correction.

A person who has been requested to make a correction may ask the requester to provide reasonably available information regarding the falsity of the statement, not later than the 30th day after receiving the request. The requester must then provide it not later than the 30th day after receiving that ask.

Two 30-day periods running in sequence, which is why the request section tolls limitations during them.

The provision addresses the publisher's real difficulty. A demand for retraction asserts that something is false, and the publisher — who believed the statement true when it published — often has no way to evaluate that without knowing what the claimant knows.

The sanction is in subsection (b): if a correction is not made, a person who without good cause fails to disclose the requested information may not recover exemplary damagesunless the publication was made with actual malice.

The actual malice exception is important. A publisher who knew the statement was false, or acted with reckless disregard, gains nothing from this section. It protects the publisher who wanted to get it right.

"Reasonably available" and "without good cause" both soften the obligation. A claimant need not conduct an investigation, and a genuine reason for withholding preserves the punitive claim.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a publisher ask me to prove the statement is false?

Yes. Within 30 days of your request it may ask for reasonably available information regarding falsity, and you have 30 days to provide it.

What if I do not respond?

If no correction is made and you failed without good cause to disclose, you may not recover exemplary damages — unless the publication was made with actual malice.

Do I have to investigate?

No. The obligation extends to reasonably available information.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 950 (H.B. 1759), Sec. 2, eff. June 14, 2013.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source