§ 64.092.Receiver for Contingent Interests in Minerals
Title 3. Extraordinary Remedies · Chapter 64. Receivership · Subchapter F. Receiver for Certain Mineral Interests · Last amended 2025 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 64.092
Plain-English Summary
A receivership for a different obstacle: not an absent owner but an owner who does not yet exist.
A contingent future interest is one that may vest in someone later — a remainder, a reversion, a possibility of reverter, an executory devise. The person who will take may be unborn or unascertained.
Nobody can sign a lease binding that interest, because the holder cannot be identified. Meanwhile the minerals can be drained from adjoining tracts.
On the application of a person with a vested, contingent, or possible interest, a district court or the business court division for the county may appoint a receiver pending the occurrence of the contingency where the land is susceptible to drainage, where a lease will inure to the benefit of the persons entitled to the proceeds, or where a lease is necessary for the conservation, preservation, or protection of the land or an interest in it.
Drainage is the classic case. Oil and gas migrate, and a tract that cannot be leased is a tract being emptied from next door.
The receiver may lease at public or private sale on the court’s terms and receive, hold, and invest the proceeds for those entitled according to their respective rights and interests.
Subsection (c) addresses a narrower problem: pooling. Where a lease fails to provide for pooling or its pooling provisions are ineffective as to the contingent interest, a receiver may be appointed to amend the lease to authorize pooling — on a showing that pooling protects correlative rights, prevents waste, benefits those entitled, or is necessary for conservation.
The lessee or an assignee may apply for that one, which is unusual — the party seeking the pooling authority may ask for the receiver who will grant it.
Citation reflects the difficulty of the subject. Interest holders are cited as in actions concerning title to land, and a person not in being is cited as an unknown owner.
Two limits close the section: it does not apply to land where drilling began before October 5, 1949, and it does not authorize a lease on land subject to existing homestead rights without the owner’s written consent.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a contingent future interest?
A legal or equitable interest arising by remainder, reversion, possibility of reverter, executory devise or on a condition subsequent — the holder may be unborn or unascertained.
Why is a receiver needed?
Nobody can sign a lease binding such an interest, and the minerals may be drained from adjoining tracts meanwhile.
Can a lease be amended to allow pooling?
Yes, where the lease has no effective pooling provision for the contingent interest and pooling protects correlative rights, prevents waste, or benefits those entitled.
Is the homestead protected?
Yes. The section does not authorize a lease on land subject to existing homestead rights without the owner’s written consent.
Amendment History
- Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 959, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.
- Amended by:
- Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 912 (H.B. 40), Sec. 14, eff. September 1, 2025.