RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 5.001.Rule of Decision

Title 2. Trial, Judgment, and Appeal · Subtitle A. General Provisions · Chapter 5. Rule of Decision · Last amended 2019 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 5.001 makes the rule of decision the English common law not inconsistent with Texas law, and declares the Restatements not controlling.

Full Text of § 5.001

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a)The rule of decision in this state consists of those portions of the common law of England that are not inconsistent with the constitution or the laws of this state, the constitution of this state, and the laws of this state.
(b)In any action governed by the laws of this state concerning rights and obligations under the law, the American Law Institute's Restatements of the Law are not controlling.
End

Plain-English Summary

Two subsections, and the second is a recent and pointed addition.

The rule of decision in this state consists of those portions of the common law of England that are not inconsistent with the constitution or the laws of this state, the constitution of this state, and the laws of this state.

This is the reception statute, and Texas has had one since the Republic. It answers a question every American jurisdiction had to answer: what law applies where no statute speaks.

The answer is English common law, subject to a filter. Only those portions not inconsistent with the Texas constitution or Texas statutes are received, so any conflict resolves in favour of Texas law.

The order of the three sources reflects their rank in reverse. Statutes and the state constitution displace received common law wherever they speak.

Texas’s civil law inheritance sits alongside this rather than inside it. Community property, the homestead, and the land grant system came from Spanish and Mexican law, and they survive because they entered Texas law by other routes.

Subsection (b) is the modern provision: in any action governed by Texas law, the American Law Institute’s Restatements of the Law are not controlling.

The Restatements are influential secondary works, drafted by scholars and practitioners, and Texas courts have long cited them. This does not forbid that.

What it forbids is treating them as authority. A Restatement section is a proposal about what the law should be, adopted by a private organisation; it becomes Texas law only when a Texas court or the Legislature makes it so.

Frequently Asked Questions

What law applies where no Texas statute speaks?

The common law of England, to the extent not inconsistent with the Texas constitution or Texas statutes.

Are the Restatements binding in Texas?

No. Section 5.001(b) provides that they are not controlling in an action governed by Texas law.

Can a court still cite a Restatement?

Nothing forbids citing one as persuasive material. It is not authority in its own right.

Amendment History

  • Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 959, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.
  • Amended by:
  • Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 845 (H.B. 2757), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2019.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source