RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 172.210.Participation Not Waiver of Rights

Title 7. Alternate Methods of Dispute Resolution · Chapter 172. Arbitration and Conciliation of International Commercial Disputes · Subchapter H. Provisions Relating Only to Conciliation · Last amended 1997 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 172.210 provides that submitting to conciliation waives no right or remedy a party would otherwise have, except a right or remedy waived in a settlement resulting from the conciliation.

Full Text of § 172.210

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a)A party by submitting to conciliation does not waive a right or remedy that party would have had if conciliation had not been initiated.
(b)Subsection (a) does not apply to the waiver of a right or remedy stated in a settlement resulting from the conciliation.
End

Plain-English Summary

The reassurance that lets a cautious party participate.

Participation costs nothing. A party submitting to conciliation does not waive a right or remedy it would have had if conciliation had not been initiated.

The rule covers rights and remedies generally, not only the claim itself.

It works with the tolling provision. Section 172.207 stops limitation periods running, so participation costs neither rights nor time.

Confidentiality completes the protection. Section 172.206 keeps what was said out of a later arbitration or civil action.

Jurisdiction is protected too. Section 172.213 provides that requesting or participating in conciliation is not consent to the jurisdiction of a Texas court if the conciliation fails.

The exception is the settlement itself. A right or remedy stated as waived in a settlement resulting from the conciliation is waived.

That is the ordinary consequence of settling. A party that agrees to release a claim has released it.

Together these sections answer the natural objection. A party asked to sit down with an adversary wants to know what it is risking, and the answer is the terms it signs and nothing else.

The rule matters most for the party with the stronger case. Agreeing to talk costs it nothing it would otherwise have.

The exception is narrow and expected. What is waived is what the settlement says is waived.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does agreeing to conciliate give anything up?

No. A party does not waive a right or remedy it would have had if conciliation had not been initiated.

What is the exception?

A right or remedy waived in a settlement resulting from the conciliation.

Does participating submit a party to Texas jurisdiction?

No. Section 172.213 says it does not, if the conciliation fails.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 109, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989. Redesignated from Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 249-27 and amended by
  • Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 588, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 5.02, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source