RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 172.175.Interim Orders

Title 7. Alternate Methods of Dispute Resolution · Chapter 172. Arbitration and Conciliation of International Commercial Disputes · Subchapter G. Judicial Proceedings · Last amended 2025 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 172.175 lets a party seek interim protection from a court before or during an arbitration, lets it enforce a tribunal’s interim order, permits attachment and preliminary injunctions, and requires preclusive effect for tribunal findings subject to a jurisdiction check.

Full Text of § 172.175

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

(a)A party to an arbitration agreement may request an interim measure of protection from a district court or the business court before or during an arbitration. The party shall select the court in the manner described by Section 171.096.
(b)A party to an arbitration may request from the court enforcement of an order of an arbitration tribunal granting an interim measure of protection under Section 172.083. The court shall grant enforcement as provided by the law applicable to the type of interim relief requested.
(c)In connection with a pending arbitration, the court may take appropriate action, including:
(1)ordering an attachment issued to assure that the award to which the applicant may be entitled is not rendered ineffectual by the dissipation of party assets; or
(2)granting a preliminary injunction to protect a trade secret or to conserve goods that are the subject matter of the dispute.
(d)In considering a request for interim relief, the court shall give preclusive effect to a finding of fact of the arbitration tribunal in the arbitration, including a finding of fact relating to the probable validity of the claim that is the subject of the order for interim relief that the tribunal has granted, if the interim order is consistent with public policy.
(e)If the arbitration tribunal has not ruled on an objection to its jurisdiction, the court may not grant preclusive effect to the tribunal's finding until the court makes an independent finding as to the jurisdiction of the tribunal. If the court rules that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction under applicable law, the court shall deny the application for interim measures of relief.
End

Plain-English Summary

Urgent relief, and the section is built so that a court can act without taking the case over.

A party may ask a court for an interim measure of protection before or during an arbitration, selecting the court as Section 171.096 provides.

Court relief is available even before a tribunal exists, which is when it is most often needed.

A tribunal’s own interim order can be enforced. A party may ask the court to enforce an order granting an interim measure under Section 172.083, and the court grants enforcement as provided by the law applicable to that type of relief.

Two examples of court action are given: an attachment to keep the award from being rendered ineffectual by dissipation of party assets, and a preliminary injunction to protect a trade secret or conserve goods that are the subject matter of the dispute.

The court gives preclusive effect to the tribunal’s findings of fact, including a finding on the probable validity of the claim underlying the interim relief the tribunal granted, if the interim order is consistent with public policy.

That deference is unusual and deliberate. It keeps the court from re-trying what the tribunal has already found while granting the relief only a court can enforce.

Jurisdiction is the exception to the deference. Where the tribunal has not ruled on an objection to its jurisdiction, the court may not give preclusive effect until it makes an independent finding on that jurisdiction.

A finding of no jurisdiction ends the application. The court shall deny interim relief if it rules the tribunal lacked jurisdiction under applicable law.

This is the second section that reaches beyond Texas-seated arbitrations under Section 172.001(b).

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a party get a court injunction while arbitrating?

Yes. A party may request an interim measure of protection from a court before or during an arbitration.

Can a court enforce the tribunal’s interim order?

Yes, as provided by the law applicable to the type of interim relief requested.

Does the court re-decide the facts?

No. It gives preclusive effect to the tribunal’s findings if the interim order is consistent with public policy.

What if the tribunal’s jurisdiction is disputed?

The court must make an independent finding on jurisdiction first, and denies relief if it rules the tribunal lacked it.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 5.02, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
  • Amended by:
  • Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 912 (H.B. 40), Sec. 41, eff. September 1, 2025.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source