§ 172.110.Supplement or Amendment to Statement
Title 7. Alternate Methods of Dispute Resolution · Chapter 172. Arbitration and Conciliation of International Commercial Disputes · Subchapter E. Arbitration Proceedings · Last amended 1997 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 172.110
Plain-English Summary
Amendment is the default, with two ways to stop it.
A party may amend or supplement a claim or defense during the arbitration. No leave is required as a starting point.
The parties may agree otherwise, and institutional rules sometimes impose a cut-off.
The tribunal may refuse. It may consider the amendment inappropriate considering the delay in making it.
Delay is the stated criterion. The section does not speak of prejudice or of the merits of the amendment, but of when it was offered.
The liberal default suits an evolving record. International cases develop as documents are exchanged and experts report, and a rigid pleading rule would force parties to plead defensively at the start.
The tribunal’s discretion is the counterweight. An amendment sprung late can force a postponement and additional cost, and the tribunal that will bear the schedule decides.
Equal treatment still applies. Section 172.101 requires a full opportunity to present a case, and a party facing a late amendment must have a chance to answer it.
An amended claim can affect the award. Section 172.148 allows an additional award for a claim presented but omitted, which presupposes the claims before the tribunal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a party amend its claim during an international arbitration?
Yes, unless the parties agreed otherwise or the tribunal considers it inappropriate given the delay.
What is the test for refusing?
The tribunal considers the delay in making the amendment or supplement.
Does the other side get to respond?
The equal treatment provision requires a full opportunity to present the case.
Amendment History
- Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 5.02, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.