§ 172.052.Nationality of Arbitrator
Title 7. Alternate Methods of Dispute Resolution · Chapter 172. Arbitration and Conciliation of International Commercial Disputes · Subchapter C. Arbitrators · Last amended 1997 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 172.052
Plain-English Summary
Eight words that answer a question domestic statutes never have to ask.
Nationality is no bar. A person of any nationality may serve as an arbitrator under this chapter.
The rule matters because the parties are from different countries. A statute silent on the point would invite an argument that a foreign national cannot preside over a Texas-seated arbitration.
It also protects party choice. Parties often want an arbitrator experienced in a particular industry or legal tradition, and that person may hold any passport.
Nationality still figures in appointment. Section 172.055(3) tells a court appointing a sole or third arbitrator to consider the advisability of choosing someone of a nationality other than that of any party.
The two provisions work together. Nationality is never a disqualification, and neutrality of nationality is a factor when a court is choosing the presiding arbitrator.
The parties can impose their own requirement. An agreement may require a particular nationality or exclude one, and Section 172.055(1) directs a court to consider qualifications the agreement requires.
Failing an agreed qualification is a challenge ground. Section 172.057 allows a challenge where the arbitrator lacks a qualification the parties agreed on.
The section reflects the chapter’s origin in a model law written for arbitrations between parties from different countries.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a foreign national serve as arbitrator in Texas?
Yes. A person of any nationality may be an arbitrator.
Does nationality matter at all?
A court appointing a sole or third arbitrator considers the advisability of a nationality other than that of any party.
Can the parties require a particular nationality?
Yes, and failing an agreed qualification is a ground for challenge.
Amendment History
- Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 109, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989. Redesignated from Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 249-8 and amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 588, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. Amended by
- Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 5.02, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.