RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 16.036.Extension of Real Property Lien

Title 2. Trial, Judgment, and Appeal · Subtitle B. Trial Matters · Chapter 16. Limitations · Subchapter B. Limitations of Real Property Actions · Last amended 1997 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 16.036 lets the parties primarily liable on a debt extend a real property lien by a written agreement that is acknowledged and recorded, keeping the lien alive four years past the new maturity date.

Full Text of § 16.036

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

(a)The party or parties primarily liable for a debt or obligation secured by a real property lien, as that term is defined in Section 16.035, may suspend the running of the four-year limitations period for real property liens through a written extension agreement as provided by this section.
(b)The limitations period is suspended and the lien remains in effect for four years after the extended maturity date of the debt or obligation if the extension agreement is:
(1)signed and acknowledged as provided by law for a deed conveying real property; and
(2)filed for record in the county clerk's office of the county where the real property is located.
(c)The parties may continue to extend the lien by entering, acknowledging, and recording additional extension agreements.
(d)The maturity date stated in the original instrument or in the date of the recorded renewal and extension is conclusive evidence of the maturity date of the debt or obligation.
(e)The limitations period under this section is not affected by Section 3.118, Business & Commerce Code.
End

Plain-English Summary

The escape from the four-year lien deadline, with three conditions attached.

The party or parties primarily liable for a debt secured by a real property lien may suspend the running of the four-year period through a written extension agreement.

Note who can do it. The section names those primarily liable — not a guarantor, not a subsequent owner who took subject to the lien. An extension signed by the wrong party does not suspend anything.

Two formalities are required, and both matter: the agreement must be signed and acknowledged as provided by law for a deed conveying real property, and it must be filed for record in the county clerk’s office of the county where the property is located.

An agreement meeting those conditions keeps the lien in effect for four years after the extended maturity date — so the extension resets the clock rather than merely pausing it.

Subsection (c) allows this to be repeated without limit. The parties may continue to extend by entering, acknowledging, and recording additional agreements, so a lien can in principle be kept alive indefinitely.

Subsection (d) closes off later argument. The maturity date stated in the original instrument, or in the recorded renewal and extension, is conclusive evidence of the maturity date. A title examiner can therefore read the record and know the answer.

That conclusiveness is what makes the recording requirement worth the trouble: the point of the machinery is to let anyone dealing with the property determine from the county records whether the lien is still alive.

The next section supplies the sanction for failing to record — the extension is void against third parties who dealt without notice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does a lender extend a lien past four years?

By a written extension agreement with the parties primarily liable, signed and acknowledged as for a deed, and filed for record in the county where the property is located.

Does an unrecorded extension work?

Not against third parties. Section 16.037 makes it void as to a purchaser, lienholder, or lessee who dealt without actual notice before it was acknowledged, filed, and recorded.

Can a lien be extended more than once?

Yes. The parties may continue to extend by entering, acknowledging, and recording additional agreements.

Who has to sign?

The party or parties primarily liable for the debt. A guarantor or a later owner is not enough.

Can the maturity date be disputed later?

No. The date stated in the original instrument or the recorded extension is conclusive evidence of it.

Amendment History

  • Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 959, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 219, Sec. 2, eff. May 23, 1997.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source