RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 144.008.Disclosure of Information Subject to Order; Penalty

Title 6. Miscellaneous Provisions · Chapter 144. Destruction of Certain Records · Last amended 1997 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 144.008 makes it a Class B misdemeanor to release records subject to an order or to fail to delete, seal or destroy them, while preserving privileged legal communications.

Full Text of § 144.008

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d)

(a)A person commits an offense if the person:
(1)knows of a former mental patient's admission to a mental health facility;
(2)knows of a court order issued under this chapter that relates to that admission; and
(3)intentionally releases, disseminates, or publishes a record or index reference subject to that order.
(b)A person commits an offense if the person:
(1)knowingly fails to delete, seal, destroy, or present to the court a record or index reference subject to an order issued under this chapter; and
(2)knows or should know that the record or index reference is subject to that order.
(c)An offense under this chapter is a Class B misdemeanor.
(d)This chapter does not prohibit an attorney or insurer of a provider or patient from retaining or communicating confidentially about a privileged document as necessary to provide legal advice regarding an actual or potential claim or issue. The document or communication remains privileged and not subject to a subpoena.
End

Plain-English Summary

The criminal enforcement provision, with two offences and one preservation.

Subsection (a) — the disclosure offence. A person commits an offence if they know of the admission, know of the order, and intentionally release, disseminate, or publish a record or index reference subject to it. All three elements are required, and the mental state is intentional.

Subsection (b) — the failure offence. A person commits an offence if they knowingly fail to delete, seal, destroy, or present to the court a record or index reference subject to an order, and know or should know it is subject to that order.

Note the mixed standard there. The failure must be knowing, but the knowledge that the record is covered may be constructive — knows or should know. An institution cannot rely on not having checked.

"Index reference" appears in both. Destroying a file while leaving it listed in an index would disclose exactly what the chapter conceals.

Both are Class B misdemeanors.

Subsection (d) preserves the legal privilege, and it is a necessary carve-out: an attorney or insurer of a provider or patient may retain or communicate confidentially about a privileged document as necessary to provide legal advice regarding an actual or potential claim. The document and communication remain privileged and not subject to a subpoena.

Without it, a lawyer advising on a claim would face a choice between competent advice and a criminal offence.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it a crime to disclose these records?

Yes. Intentionally releasing a record or index reference subject to an order, knowing of both the admission and the order, is a Class B misdemeanor.

Is failing to destroy them an offence?

Yes, where the failure is knowing and the person knows or should know the record is subject to the order.

Can a lawyer keep a copy?

Yes. An attorney or insurer may retain and confidentially discuss a privileged document as necessary for legal advice, and it stays privileged and not subject to subpoena.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1295, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source