§ 140A.109.Abatement of Suit
Title 6. Miscellaneous Provisions · Chapter 140A. Civil Racketeering Related to Trafficking of Persons · Subchapter C. Enforcement · Last amended 2017 · Last verified August 29, 2026
Full Text of § 140A.109
Plain-English Summary
The provision that gives the coordination scheme its force.
If the prosecutor determines that a suit would interfere with an ongoing criminal investigation or prosecution, after having notified the attorney general under the preceding section, the prosecutor may request, in writing, that the attorney general abate the suit. On receipt of this request, the attorney general shall abate the suit.
"Shall abate" leaves no discretion. The attorney general does not weigh the request, and a court is not asked to rule on it — the request produces abatement.
That is a striking allocation of authority. A county prosecutor can halt a statewide enforcement action brought by the attorney general, on their own determination, by writing a letter.
The determination is the prosecutor’s alone, and the section supplies no standard for it beyond interference and no mechanism for disputing it.
Two conditions do bound it. The prosecutor must have notified the attorney general of the investigation or prosecution under the preceding section first, and the request must be in writing.
The reasoning is the one running through all three sections. The local prosecutor knows what the criminal case needs; the attorney general does not, and cannot be told everything without risking the investigation further.
Abatement suspends rather than ends. The suit is paused, and the seven-year limitations period gives room for a criminal matter to conclude first.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a local prosecutor stop the attorney general’s suit?
Yes. On a written request from a prosecutor who determines the suit would interfere with a criminal matter, the attorney general shall abate it.
Does a court decide?
No. The determination is the prosecutor’s, and abatement follows the request.
Does abatement end the case?
No. It suspends the suit, and the seven-year limitations period leaves room for the criminal matter to conclude.
Amendment History
- Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1066 (H.B. 3241), Sec. 1, eff. June 14, 2013. Redesignated from Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Chapter 140 by
- Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1236 (S.B. 1296), Sec. 21.001(5), eff. September 1, 2015. Redesignated and amended by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1236, Sec. 21.002(3), eff. September 1, 2015.
- Transferred, redesignated and amended from Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Section 140A.011 by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 685 (H.B. 29), Sec. 7, eff. September 1, 2017.