RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 137.005.Limitation on Liability

Title 6. Miscellaneous Provisions · Chapter 137. Declaration for Mental Health Treatment · Last amended 1997 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 137.005 shields providers acting in good faith under a declaration, and from misconduct findings where they never knew of one or of its revocation.

Full Text of § 137.005

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a)An attending physician, health or residential care provider, or person acting for or under an attending physician's or health or residential care provider's control is not subject to criminal or civil liability and has not engaged in professional misconduct for an act or omission if the act or omission is done in good faith under the terms of a declaration for mental health treatment.
(b)An attending physician, health or residential care provider, or person acting for or under an attending physician's or health or residential care provider's control does not engage in professional misconduct for:
(1)failure to act in accordance with a declaration for mental health treatment if the physician, provider, or other person:
(A)was not provided with a copy of the declaration; and
(B)had no knowledge of the declaration after a good faith attempt to learn of the existence of a declaration; or
(2)acting in accordance with a directive for mental health treatment after the directive has expired or has been revoked if the physician, provider, or other person does not have knowledge of the expiration or revocation.
End

Plain-English Summary

The liability protection, and it covers three different situations.

An attending physician, health or residential care provider, or person acting under their control is not subject to criminal or civil liability and has not engaged in professional misconduct for an act or omission done in good faith under the terms of a declaration.

All three exposures are addressed at once — criminal, civil, and disciplinary — which matters because a mental health treatment decision can attract all three.

"In good faith" is the condition, and it is the only one. A provider who follows a declaration in good faith is protected even where the reading turns out to be wrong.

Without such a provision the chapter would not work. A declaration refusing a medication a physician believes is needed puts that physician in an impossible position, and protection is what allows the document to be followed.

Subsection (b) protects against a misconduct finding in two further situations, and note that it covers professional misconduct only — not civil or criminal liability.

First, failing to follow a declaration where the provider was not given a copy and had no knowledge of it after a good faith attempt to learn whether one existed.

The attempt is required. Ignorance protects a provider who looked and found nothing, not one who never asked.

Second, acting under a declaration after it has expired or been revoked, where the provider does not know.

That protection is necessary given how revocation works. A principal may revoke by acting in a manner demonstrating intent to revoke, which a provider may not witness or recognise.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a doctor protected for following a declaration?

Yes. Acts and omissions in good faith under its terms carry no criminal or civil liability and are not professional misconduct.

What if the provider never saw the declaration?

No misconduct, where they were not given a copy and had no knowledge after a good faith attempt to learn of one.

What if it had been revoked?

Acting under a revoked or expired declaration is not misconduct where the provider does not know of the revocation or expiry.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1318, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source