RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 123.001.Definitions

Title 6. Miscellaneous Provisions · Chapter 123. Interception of Communication · Last amended 2019 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 123.001 defines communication and interception, excluding the ordinary use of telephones, hearing aids, wireless receivers and cable systems.

Full Text of § 123.001

Text size

In this chapter:
(1)"Communication" means speech uttered by a person or information including speech that is transmitted in whole or in part with the aid of a wire or cable.
(2)"Interception" means the aural acquisition of the contents of a communication through the use of an interception device that is made without the consent of a party to the communication, but does not include the ordinary use of:
(A)a telephone or telegraph instrument or facility or telephone and telegraph equipment;
(B)a hearing aid designed to correct subnormal hearing to not better than normal;
(C)a radio, television, or other wireless receiver; or
(D)a cable system that relays a public wireless broadcast from a common antenna to a receiver.
End

Plain-English Summary

Two definitions, and the exclusions in the second are what keep the chapter workable.

"Communication" means speech uttered by a person or information including speech that is transmitted in whole or in part with the aid of a wire or cable.

Two things are covered: spoken words, and transmitted information. The first limb reaches a conversation in a room with no technology involved; the second reaches anything carried over a wire.

"Interception" means the aural acquisition of the contents of a communication through the use of an interception device that is made without the consent of a party to the communication.

"Aural" confines the chapter to listening. Acquiring the contents by reading — intercepting text rather than sound — is outside this definition.

"Without the consent of a party" is the element that decides most disputes. Texas is a one-party consent jurisdiction: a participant may record their own conversation, because a party consented.

Four exclusions follow, each describing ordinary use of ordinary equipment. A telephone or telegraph instrument, facility or equipment; a hearing aid designed to correct subnormal hearing to not better than normal; a radio, television, or other wireless receiver; and a cable system relaying a public wireless broadcast from a common antenna to a receiver.

The hearing aid exclusion is precisely drawn. A device correcting hearing to normal is excluded; one amplifying beyond normal is not, which is what separates an aid from a listening device.

"Ordinary use" governs all four. A telephone used as a telephone is excluded; one modified to monitor another line is not.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I record my own phone call in Texas?

Interception requires the absence of consent from a party to the communication, and a participant is a party.

Does the chapter cover written messages?

The definition is confined to aural acquisition, so acquiring contents by reading rather than listening falls outside it.

Are hearing aids covered?

Not where designed to correct subnormal hearing to no better than normal. A device amplifying beyond that is not excluded.

Amendment History

  • Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 959, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985.
  • Amended by:
  • Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1058 (H.B. 2931), Sec. 3.02, eff. January 1, 2019.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source