RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 116.002.Certain Settlement Terms Prohibited

Title 5. Governmental Liability · Chapter 116. Settlement of Claim or Action Against Governmental Unit · Last amended 2017 · Last verified August 29, 2026

In one sentenceSection 116.002 forbids a governmental unit from settling a claim of $30,000 or more with public money on a condition that the claimant not disclose the facts, and voids any such provision.

Full Text of § 116.002

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a)A governmental unit may not enter into a settlement of a claim or action against the governmental unit in which:
(1)the amount of the settlement is equal to or greater than $30,000;
(2)the money that would be used to pay the settlement is:
(A)derived from taxes collected by a governmental unit;
(B)received from the state; or
(C)insurance proceeds received from an insurance policy for which the premium was paid with taxes collected by a governmental unit or money received from the state; and
(3)a condition of the settlement requires a party seeking affirmative relief against the governmental unit to agree not to disclose any fact, allegation, evidence, or other matter to any other person, including a journalist or other member of the media.
(b)A settlement agreement provision entered into in violation of Subsection (a) is void and unenforceable.
End

Plain-English Summary

Public money settling public claims, on condition that the public not be told — that is the arrangement this section ends.

Three elements must all be present before the ban applies.

First, the settlement is $30,000 or more. Smaller settlements are outside the section.

Second, the money is public. It must be derived from taxes collected by a governmental unit, received from the state, or paid from insurance proceeds under a policy whose premium was itself paid with tax money or state money.

The insurance clause closes an obvious gap. A settlement paid by a carrier is still funded by the public if the public bought the policy.

Third, the settlement conditions relief on silence. The prohibited term requires a party seeking affirmative relief to agree not to disclose any fact, allegation, evidence or other matter to any other person.

Journalists are named in the text — "including a journalist or other member of the media" — which leaves no room to argue that a clause aimed at the press is something other than a nondisclosure condition.

The remedy is severance, not invalidity of the whole deal. A settlement provision entered into in violation of the section is void and unenforceable; the settlement itself stands.

That drafting protects the claimant. A person who settled and gave up a claim does not lose the settlement because the government insisted on a term the statute forbids.

Frequently Asked Questions

When does the ban apply?

When the settlement is $30,000 or more, the money is public or comes from a publicly funded insurance policy, and the settlement requires the claimant to keep the matter secret.

What happens to a secrecy clause that violates the section?

The provision is void and unenforceable. The rest of the settlement is unaffected.

Does the ban cover settlements paid by an insurer?

Yes, where the premium was paid with taxes collected by a governmental unit or with money received from the state.

Does it apply to small settlements?

No. The threshold is $30,000.

Amendment History

  • Added by Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 688 (H.B. 53), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2017.
Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Texas Legislature Online (statutes.capitol.texas.gov). Enacted by the Texas Legislature. Current through May 14, 2026. Last verified August 29, 2026. · Official source