§ 426.Statement Under Penalty of Perjury
Chapter 10: Evidence · Last amended November 1, 2021 · Last verified August 3, 2026
Full Text of § 426
Amendment History
Amended by Laws 2021, c. 362, s. 1, eff. 11/1/2021. Amended by Laws 2020, c. 10, s. 1, eff. 5/7/2020. Added by Laws 2002, HB 1939, c. 468, §2, eff. 11/1/2002.
Plain-English Summary
Subsection A offers a shortcut. Wherever Oklahoma law calls for a matter to be proved by a sworn statement, declaration, verification, certificate, oath, or affidavit, the person can instead sign an unsworn written statement under penalty of perjury, dated and stating that it's made under Oklahoma law. The statute even supplies suggested wording. That signed statement carries the same legal force as the sworn version, though it doesn't change any requirement that a real-property instrument be acknowledged.
Subsection B pulls back the shortcut for four situations: depositions, oaths of office, oaths required before a specific official other than a notary, and any notarial act, oath, or affidavit that Title 26 (election law) requires. For those, the traditional sworn form still applies.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I sign an unsworn statement instead of getting an affidavit notarized in Oklahoma?
Yes, for most purposes. Section 426 lets a person substitute a written statement signed under penalty of perjury for a sworn statement, declaration, or affidavit, as long as it states the date, place, and that it's made under Oklahoma law.
What wording does Oklahoma law suggest for this type of statement?
The statute gives a sample form declaring "I state under penalty of perjury under the laws of Oklahoma that the foregoing is true and correct," followed by the date, place, and signature.
Does this substitute work for every type of sworn document?
No. It doesn't apply to depositions, oaths of office, oaths required before a specific official other than a notary public, or any notarial act, oath, or affidavit required by Title 26 election law.
Does an unsworn statement under this section satisfy real-property acknowledgment requirements?
No. The statute says it doesn't affect any requirement that an instrument affecting real property be acknowledged.