§ 2611.8.Determination of Whether to Allow Child Witness to Testify By an Alternative Method
Chapter 40: Oklahoma Evidence Code · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified August 3, 2026
Full Text of § 2611.8
Amendment History
Added by Laws 2003, HB 1635, c. 405, §6, eff. 11/1/2003.
Plain-English Summary
Meeting the trauma or best-interests standard in Section 2611.7 doesn't automatically produce an alternative-method order. Section 2611.8 has the judge or presiding officer weigh seven additional factors: what alternative methods are reasonably available, whether the child's interests can be protected without resorting to one, the nature of the case, the relative rights of the parties, how important the child's proposed testimony is, the degree of trauma the child would suffer without an alternative method, and any other relevant factor.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does meeting the Section 2611.7 standard guarantee an alternative-method order?
No. Section 2611.8 requires the judge to separately weigh seven factors before deciding whether to allow the alternative method.
What factors does the judge consider at this stage?
Available alternative methods, other ways to protect the child without one, the nature of the case, the parties' relative rights, the importance of the child's testimony, the degree of trauma without an alternative method, and any other relevant factor.
Does this section reference an earlier standard?
Yes. It applies once the judge determines that the standard set out in Section 2611.7 has been met.