§ 2513.Comment Upon Or Inference From Claim of Privilege - Instruction
Chapter 40: Oklahoma Evidence Code · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified August 3, 2026
Full Text of § 2513
Amendment History
Laws 1978, SB 276, c. 285, § 513, eff. 10/1/1978.
Plain-English Summary
Once someone claims a privilege -- in the present case or an earlier one -- Section 2513(A) shuts the door on making anything of it: no comment by the judge or counsel, and no inference drawn from the claim. Subsection B pushes that principle into how jury trials run, requiring proceedings, so far as practicable, to be conducted so privilege claims can be made outside the jury's knowledge.
Subsection C gives a party a concrete remedy: on request, any party against whom the jury might otherwise draw an adverse inference from a privilege claim is entitled to an instruction telling the jury no inference may be drawn.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a lawyer tell the jury that a witness "took the privilege"?
No. Section 2513(A) bars comment by judge or counsel on a claim of privilege and forbids drawing any inference from it.
Does this protection cover a privilege claimed in an earlier proceeding?
Yes. Section 2513(A) applies whether the privilege was claimed in the present proceeding or on a prior occasion.
How does the court keep privilege claims away from the jury?
Subsection B requires conducting proceedings, to the extent practicable, so that privilege claims can be made without the jury knowing about them.
Can a party get a jury instruction about a privilege claim?
Yes. On request, a party facing a possible adverse inference from someone else's privilege claim is entitled to an instruction that no inference may be drawn.