§ 2203.Determining Propriety of Taking Judicial Notice
Chapter 40: Oklahoma Evidence Code · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified August 3, 2026
Full Text of § 2203
Amendment History
Laws 1978, SB 276, c. 285, § 203, eff. 10/1/1978.
Plain-English Summary
When a court is figuring out whether judicial notice is proper, it isn't limited to what the parties hand it -- subsection A lets the court consult any source of pertinent information, and no exclusionary rule except a valid claim of privilege stands in the way.
A party still gets a say. Subsection B guarantees an opportunity to be heard, on timely request, about whether notice is proper and how far it should reach -- and if there was no advance warning, the party can raise the issue after notice has already been taken. Subsection C confirms there's no deadline: judicial notice may be taken at any stage of the proceeding.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a court look outside what the parties submitted when deciding on judicial notice?
Yes. Section 2203(A) lets the court consult and use any source of pertinent information, whether or not a party furnished it.
Do the rules of evidence limit what a court can look at for judicial notice?
No exclusionary rule applies except a valid claim of privilege, under subsection A(2).
What if I didn't get advance notice the court was taking judicial notice of something?
Subsection B lets you request an opportunity to be heard even after the fact, if you didn't get prior notification.
Is there a deadline for taking judicial notice?
No. Subsection C allows judicial notice to be taken at any stage of the proceeding.