RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 2018.Joinder of Claims and Remedies

Chapter 39: Oklahoma Pleading Code · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified August 3, 2026

In one sentenceSection 2018 lets a party join as many legal or equitable claims as it has against an opposing party in a single action, permits consolidating cases that share a common question, and allows a plaintiff to pursue a money claim and a fraudulent-conveyance claim together without first winning the money judgment.

Full Text of § 2018

Text sizeJump to: (A) (B) (C) (D)

A. JOINDER OF CLAIMS. A party asserting a claim to relief as an original claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, may join, either as independent or as alternate claims, as many claims, legal or equitable, as he has against an opposing party.
B. JOINDER OF REMEDIES; FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES. Whenever a claim is one heretofore cognizable only after another claim has been prosecuted to a conclusion, the two claims may be joined in a single action; but the court shall grant relief in that action only in accordance with the relative substantive rights of the parties. In particular, a plaintiff may state a claim for money and a claim to have set aside a conveyance fraudulent as to him, without first having obtained a judgment establishing the claim for money.
C. CONSOLIDATION. When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated; and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.
D. SEPARATE TRIALS. The court, in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, or when separate trials will be conducive to expedition and economy, may order a separate trial of any claim, cross-claim, counterclaim, or third-party claim, or of any separate issue or of any number of claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, third-party claims, or issues, always preserving inviolate the right of trial by jury.

Amendment History

Added by Laws 1984, SB 417, c. 164, §18, eff. 11/1/1984.

Plain-English Summary

This section removes old restrictions on stacking claims together. A party asserting a claim, original, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party, may join as many claims, legal or equitable, independent or alternative, as it has against an opposing party. It also handles claims that historically had to wait their turn: where one claim could only be brought after another had already been resolved, both may now be joined in a single suit, with relief granted according to the parties' actual substantive rights. The section gives a concrete example: a plaintiff can sue for money owed and, in the same action, ask to set aside a fraudulent conveyance, without first getting a judgment on the debt.

Beyond a single case, subsection C lets a court consolidate or jointly try separate actions that share a common question of law or fact, managing them to avoid needless cost or delay. And within any case, subsection D gives the court discretion to order separate trials of any claim, cross-claim, counterclaim, third-party claim, or issue, for convenience, to avoid prejudice, or for efficiency, while always preserving the right to a jury trial.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a plaintiff bring several unrelated claims against the same defendant in one lawsuit?

Yes -- subsection A lets a party join as many legal or equitable claims as it has against an opposing party, whether independent or in the alternative.

Does a plaintiff have to win a money judgment before suing to unwind a fraudulent transfer?

No -- subsection B specifically allows a plaintiff to join a claim for money and a claim to set aside a fraudulent conveyance in the same action, without a prior judgment on the debt.

Can separate lawsuits be combined into one?

Yes, if they share a common question of law or fact -- subsection C lets the court order a joint hearing or trial, or consolidate the actions outright, to avoid unnecessary cost or delay.

Can the court split one lawsuit into separate trials?

Yes -- subsection D allows the court to order separate trials of any claim, issue, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim for convenience, to avoid prejudice, or for efficiency, while preserving the right to jury trial.

Source & verification. Section text is reproduced verbatim from Title 12 of the Oklahoma Statutes, enacted by the Oklahoma Legislature. Last verified August 3, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: oklahoma joinder of claims rule12 O.S. § 2018consolidation of actions oklahomaoklahoma FRCP 18 equivalent