§ 1782.Challenging Admissibility of Expert Testimony
Chapter 36: Small Claims Procedure Act · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified August 3, 2026
Full Text of § 1782
Amendment History
Added by Laws 2025, c. 311,s. 8, eff. 9/1/2025.
Plain-English Summary
Section 1782 narrows the timing for expert-witness fights in expedited actions cases. Unless the party sponsoring the expert asks for different timing, a party can only challenge the admissibility of expert testimony as an objection to summary judgment evidence, during a pretrial conference, or during trial on the merits. That restriction doesn't apply to a motion to strike for a late designation of the expert.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can I challenge an expert witness in an expedited actions case?
Only as an objection to summary judgment evidence, at a pretrial conference, or during trial -- unless the party sponsoring the expert asks for a different timing.
Are there exceptions to this timing restriction?
Yes -- it doesn't apply to a motion to strike based on a late designation of the expert.
Does this timing rule apply to expert testimony challenges in every Oklahoma civil case?
No -- Section 1782 sets this rule specifically for cases proceeding under the Oklahoma Expedited Actions Act.