§ 1443.1.Privileged Communication Defined - Exemption From Libel
Chapter 25: Slander and Libel · Last amended April 7, 1981 · Last verified August 3, 2026
Full Text of § 1443.1
Amendment History
Laws 1981, HB 1252, c. 21, § 1, emerg. eff. 4/7/1981.
Plain-English Summary
Section 1443.1 spells out what counts as a privileged communication -- one the law protects from libel liability even though it might otherwise look defamatory. The privilege covers statements made in a legislative or judicial proceeding, or any other proceeding the law authorizes; statements made while properly carrying out an official duty; and a fair and true report of such a proceeding, along with opinions and criticism about it.
The same protection extends to criticism of a public official's official acts. That protection has one limit: it doesn't cover a report or criticism that falsely accuses the officer of a crime. Subsection B then makes the practical point -- a publication that qualifies as privileged under this section can't be punished as libel.
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes a statement "privileged" and safe from a libel claim in Oklahoma?
Under Section 1443.1, a statement is privileged if it's made in a legislative or judicial proceeding, in the discharge of an official duty, or in a fair and true report of such a proceeding, including opinion and criticism about it.
Can a news outlet be sued for reporting on a court case?
Not for a fair and true report of the proceeding, or for opinions and criticism about it -- the statute treats that kind of reporting as privileged.
Can you criticize a public official without risking a libel suit?
Yes, criticism of a public official's official acts is privileged, but the protection doesn't extend to a report that falsely accuses the official of committing a crime.
If a communication is privileged under this section, can it still be libel?
No. Subsection B states directly that a publication privileged under this section can't be punished as libel.