§ 1194.State Or Political Subdivisions As Garnishee - Judgments
Chapter 21: Garnishment and Attachment · Last amended November 1, 2005 · Last verified August 3, 2026
Full Text of § 1194
Amendment History
Laws 1925, SB 128, c. 33, p. 51, § 3; Amended by Laws 1965, HB 877, c. 297, § 16; Amended by Laws 2005, HB 1516, c. 78, §1, eff. 11/1/2005.
Plain-English Summary
No judgment can be rendered against the state, a county, city, town, board of education, school board, or other municipal subdivision named as a garnishee. But the officer who was personally served under Section 1193 isn't automatically off the hook -- if he willfully fails, neglects, or refuses to answer the garnishment summons, judgment may be entered against him.
The statute limits that personal exposure to willful conduct. A state, county, city, town, board of education, or school board employee served in this role isn't personally liable unless the failure, neglect, or refusal was willful.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a court enter judgment against the state itself in a garnishment case?
No. Judgment can't be rendered against the state, county, city, town, board of education, school board, or other municipal subdivision named as garnishee.
Can the individual official who was served be held personally liable?
Only if he willfully fails, neglects, or refuses to answer the garnishment summons -- an honest mistake doesn't count.
Does this protect every government employee automatically?
No. The protection depends on the failure not being willful; a willful refusal to answer opens the door to judgment against that person.