Rule 3.Objections to Service and Venue
Rules for District Courts of Oklahoma · Last amended November 1, 1984 · Last verified August 3, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3
Amendment History
Withdrawn and replaced by order of Oct. 30, 1984, eff. 11/1/1984.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 3 draws a line between two kinds of counterclaims. Ask for affirmative relief on a permissive counterclaim, a crossclaim, or a third-party petition, and you submit yourself to the court's jurisdiction — objections to personal jurisdiction, to how the summons was issued or served, or to venue, are waived. Assert a compulsory counterclaim instead — one you have to bring in this case or lose it — and none of those objections are waived, since you had no real choice about raising it.
This waiver doctrine connects to Rule 19, which addresses waiver of the same kinds of procedural defects when a party appears in a proceeding to vacate a judgment without objecting right away, and to Rule 1's own reference to the compulsory-counterclaim provision, Section 2013A.
Frequently Asked Questions
If I file a counterclaim, do I lose my objection to personal jurisdiction?
It depends on the type of counterclaim. Rule 3 says asking for affirmative relief on a permissive counterclaim waives jurisdiction, service, and venue objections, but a compulsory counterclaim does not.
What's the difference between a compulsory and a permissive counterclaim for this purpose?
A compulsory counterclaim is one you're required to bring in the same case or lose it; a permissive counterclaim is optional. Rule 3 only penalizes the choice to seek relief on an optional claim.
Does filing a crossclaim or third-party petition waive my venue objection too?
Yes. Rule 3 treats seeking affirmative relief on a crossclaim or third-party petition the same as a permissive counterclaim for waiver purposes.