Rule 28.Instructing As to Issues of Fact
Rules for District Courts of Oklahoma · Last amended August 1, 2013 · Last verified August 3, 2026
Full Text of Rule 28
Amendment History
Amended by order of the Supreme Court, 2013 OK 68, eff. 8/1/2013.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 28 puts the job of framing the factual dispute on the judge, not the parties' own pleadings. It is the trial judge's duty to determine the issues of fact in a civil case and inform the jury, in clear and succinct language, what those issues are. The judge should not make the jury work out the fact issues from the pleadings, and should not set the pleadings out in the jury instructions, in whole or in part.
Frequently Asked Questions
Whose job is it to tell the jury what facts are in dispute?
The trial judge's. Rule 28 makes it the judge's duty to determine the fact issues in a civil case and state them to the jury in clear, succinct language.
Why can't the judge just quote the pleadings to define the issues?
Pleadings are often broader and more technical than the actual dispute at trial, and Rule 28 requires the judge to state the real issues of fact in clear language instead of leaving jurors to sort them out from the pleadings.
Can the judge just read the pleadings to the jury to explain what's disputed?
No. Rule 28 says the judge should not require the jury to determine the fact issues from the pleadings, or set the pleadings out in the instructions in whole or in part.