Rule 24.Legislative Continuances
Rules for District Courts of Oklahoma · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified August 3, 2026
Full Text of Rule 24
Plain-English Summary
Rule 24 makes a continuance mandatory for a legislator-lawyer once several conditions line up: the case is set for hearing or trial during a legislative session, a written motion was filed a reasonable time before the setting and served on opposing counsel with notice to the assigned judge, the client is bona fide, and the motion is made in good faith. In criminal cases, the rule adds two more conditions — the incarcerated defendant's written consent, and confirmation that the legislator-lawyer was retained to try the case on the merits, not mainly to obtain a continuance. If a litigant who already has counsel later brings in a legislator-lawyer as additional or co-counsel to seek the continuance, the trial court may treat that motion as falling outside these guidelines altogether.
Frequently Asked Questions
I'm a state legislator and also a practicing attorney. Can I get my case continued during the legislative session?
Yes, if it's set for hearing or trial during the session, you file a timely written motion in good faith, serve it on opposing counsel, notify the judge, and represent a bona fide client — Rule 24 makes the continuance mandatory once those conditions are met.
Does it matter if my client already had other counsel before I came on as a legislator-lawyer?
It can. Rule 24 lets the trial court treat a continuance motion as outside these guidelines when a litigant who already has counsel later brings on a legislator-lawyer as co-counsel or additional counsel who then seeks the continuance.
Are there extra requirements in a criminal case?
Yes. Rule 24 requires the incarcerated defendant's written consent to the continuance, and requires that the legislator-lawyer was retained to try the case on the merits, not mainly to get a continuance as a sitting legislator.