§ 6203.Attaching creditor’s rights in personal property.
Article 62. Attachment · Last amended 1963 · Last verified July 21, 2026
Full Text of CPLR 6203
Plain-English Summary
An attachment does more than freeze property; it gives the plaintiff a claim on that property that outranks people who later acquire an interest in it. Under CPLR 6203, once the plaintiff delivers the order of attachment to the sheriff, the plaintiff's rights in the defendant's debt or personal property become superior, up to the amount of the attachment, to the rights of anyone the defendant later transfers that debt or property to.
Two exceptions protect innocent transferees. A transferee who acquired the debt or property before it was levied upon, for fair consideration or without knowledge of the attachment order, keeps priority over the plaintiff. So does a transferee who acquired it after levy, for fair consideration and without knowledge of the levy, so long as the sheriff had not yet taken possession. The two exceptions are not identical: the pre-levy exception needs only one of those two things, fair consideration or lack of knowledge, while the post-levy exception demands both, plus that the sheriff had not yet taken possession. A pre-levy transferee who knew about the order can still prevail by showing fair consideration, but a post-levy transferee loses the shelter if either element is missing.
Frequently Asked Questions
What priority does an attachment give a plaintiff over the defendant's property?
Under CPLR 6203, once the plaintiff delivers the order of attachment to the sheriff, the plaintiff's rights in the defendant's property or debt outrank a later transferee's rights, up to the amount of the attachment.
Can a good-faith buyer still get priority over an attaching plaintiff?
Yes. Before levy, the buyer needs to show either fair consideration or lack of knowledge of the order, not both; after levy, so long as the sheriff had not taken possession, the buyer must show both fair consideration and lack of knowledge of the levy.
Does an attaching plaintiff always beat every later transferee?
No. CPLR 6203 carves out transferees who paid fair consideration without knowledge of the attachment or the levy, depending on timing.
When does a plaintiff's priority under CPLR 6203 begin?
It begins when the plaintiff delivers the order of attachment to the sheriff, not when the sheriff completes the levy.
What happens if a transferee knew about the attachment before buying the property?
It depends on timing. Before levy, knowledge alone does not defeat the exception if the transferee paid fair consideration; after levy, knowledge of the levy defeats the exception outright, regardless of consideration paid.
Advisory Committee Notes
This section is derived from the last sentence of the third paragraph of former § 917(2). Under the new CPLR as well as under former § 917(2), a garnishee, served with an order of attachment, is forbidden to transfer the defendant’s property even if it is not manually seized by the sheriff. However, this section defines the rights of the innocent purchaser, where the garnishee sells in violation of the provisions. See 7 NY Jud Council Rep 436–37 (1941). Real property is excepted because, under former § 917(1), a notice of attachment of realty was filed and indexed in the same manner as a lis pendens. Thus, a purchaser was held to have notice and knowledge of the attachment.
Amendment History
Add, L 1962, ch 308, eff Sept 1, 1963.